Results of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents vs Biolimus-Eluting Polymer-Free Stents After 2 Years. Are They Safe in Patients at High Risk for Bleeding?

The proportion of patients treated with coronary angioplasty who are at a high risk for bleeding is increasing. In this population, extended dual antithrombotic therapy increases the risk of bleeding.

Resultados a 2 años de los stents liberadores de Zotarolimus vs stents libres de polímero liberadores de Biolimus. ¿Son seguros en pacientes con alto riesgo de sangrado?

The 1-year randomized Onyx one study has demonstrated the non-inferiority of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) vs. biolimus-coated polymer-free stent BioFreedom (DCS). Patients received dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) until the first month after coronary angioplasty, and then continued with single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT).

The aim of this study was to present the 2-year results.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, probable or definite stent thrombosis. The secondary endpoint (SEP) was treated lesion failure. 

The study analyzed 1996 patients; 1003 were randomized to the ZES arm and 993, to the DCS arm. Mean patient age was 74 years old, and most subjects were male. Fifty-two percent of patients experienced acute coronary syndrome (most frequently non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).

Read also: PCI on Native Arteries or Saphenous Vein Grafts: Which Has Better Prognosis?

There were no differences in the PEP and the SEP between groups at 2 years of follow-up.

Conclusion

Among patients at high risk for bleeding treated with one month of DAPT followed by SAPT, Resolute Onyx stents had similar safety and effectiveness outcomes compared with BioFreedom stents at the 2-year follow-up.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Polymer-Based Versus Polymer-Free Stents in High Bleeding Risk Patients Final 2-Year Results From Onyx ONE.

Reference: Stephan Windecker, MD et alJ Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:1153–1163.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...