High Risk of Bleeding after PCI: More Evidence for Short DAPT

Dual antiaggregation therapy (DAPT) with ASA and P2Y12 during 6 to 12 months is the indicated strategy after DES stenting to reduce ischemic events. However, in patients with elevated risk of bleeding (HBR) guideline and expert recommendations is 1-6 months, since there is plenty of evidence in favor, except for a randomized study, the MASTER DAPT, and different analysis or registries. 

Alto Riesgo de Sangrado luego de la ATC: más evidencia para DAPT de corta duración

This meta-analysis of 932 studies selected three randomized controlled trials with 8895 patients and 3 studies with 7953 matched with propensity score, all presenting HBR. 8422 of these patients received DAPT from 6 to 12 months (L –DAPT) and 8426 DAPT for 1 to 3 months (S-DAPT).

Patients receiving S-DAPT showed a lower rate of bleeding compared against L-DAPT patients, 2.6% vs. 3.8% [OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.89 absolute risk difference -1.2%]. There were no differences in MACE, or death, stroke, or MI. The presence of stent thrombosis was also similar, even though numerically superior to that of S-DAPT patients, with no statistical significance. 

Conclusion 

Among patients with HBR receiving contemporary drug eluting, S-DAPT reduced bleeding with no increase in risk of death, compared against L-DAPT. Further research is needed to assess late thrombosis after 1-to-3-month DAPT among patients with high ischemic and bleeding risk, to define the SAPT of choice afterwards.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents in high bleeding risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference: Aakash Garg, et al. Am Heart J 2022;250:1–10.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...