IN.PACT Study | Should We Start Using DCBs More Frequently in Cases of Femoropopliteal Disease?

With the new devices (drug-eluting balloons [DEB], drug-eluting stents [DES], and atherotomes) percutaneous treatment is becoming the first line of approach for femoropopliteal disease, especially when dealing with not very long total occlusions.

ELUVIA: DES en territorio femoropoplíteo con lesiones complejas

Randomized studies and registries on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in femoropopliteal disease are currently available, but their evolution beyond 2 or 3 years has not been well analyzed.

This study is a subanalysis of the IN.PACT study that analyzed a subsample of 114 Asian patients (7.42%) of the 1535 patients included. 

IN.PACT Study DCBs in Cases of Femoropopliteal Disease

The safety endpoint (SEP) was a composite of freedom from device-related mortality at 30 days and freedom from major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 60 months. 

Mean age was 67 years, 87% of patients were male, 78% had hypertension, 55% had diabetes, 12.3% had insulin-requiring diabetes, 30% were smokers, 19.8% had impaired kidney function, 8.8% required dialysis, 39.5% had infrapatellar disease, and 5.3% had undergone a previous amputation.

Ninety-three percent of patients were in Rutherford functional class 2 or 3; ABI was 0.61.

Read also: Resistant Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Myomectomy or Septal Ablation?

Twenty-seven percent of patients experienced in-stent restenosis, 6% suffered from severe calcification, 54% had total occlusions, diameter stenosis was 90% and lesion length was 174 mm.

Sixteen percent of patients required stenting due to residual lesion >50%, flow-compromising dissections, or a gradient >10mmHg, with a provisional stent length of 156.1 mm.

At 60 months, the SEP was 76%, clinically driven TLR freedom was 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.0% to 84.5%), and the occurrence of the first episode of clinically driven TLR was at 155±49 days.

There was no device-related mortality at 30 days.

Read also: FRAME-AMI: FFR vs. Angiography of Non-Culprit Vessel in ACS.

The presence of MAE or all-cause mortality at 5 years was 38.1% and 19.9%, respectively. No patient underwent amputation and only one patient had thrombosis. 

All patients improved their functional class of claudication. Furthermore, more than half of them did not present claudication and improved their quality of life.

Conclusion

This analysis of an Asian population within the IN.PACT Global Study showed results consistent with previously reported data from the IN.PACT Admiral. These data confirm the durable clinical effectiveness and 5-year safety of DCBs for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease in this “real-world” population.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board o SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Long‐term outcomes after paclitaxel‐coated balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal arteries in Asian patients of the IN.PACT Global Study.

Reference: Young‐Guk, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:1273–1283.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...