IN.PACT Study | Should We Start Using DCBs More Frequently in Cases of Femoropopliteal Disease?

With the new devices (drug-eluting balloons [DEB], drug-eluting stents [DES], and atherotomes) percutaneous treatment is becoming the first line of approach for femoropopliteal disease, especially when dealing with not very long total occlusions.

ELUVIA: DES en territorio femoropoplíteo con lesiones complejas

Randomized studies and registries on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in femoropopliteal disease are currently available, but their evolution beyond 2 or 3 years has not been well analyzed.

This study is a subanalysis of the IN.PACT study that analyzed a subsample of 114 Asian patients (7.42%) of the 1535 patients included. 

IN.PACT Study DCBs in Cases of Femoropopliteal Disease

The safety endpoint (SEP) was a composite of freedom from device-related mortality at 30 days and freedom from major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 60 months. 

Mean age was 67 years, 87% of patients were male, 78% had hypertension, 55% had diabetes, 12.3% had insulin-requiring diabetes, 30% were smokers, 19.8% had impaired kidney function, 8.8% required dialysis, 39.5% had infrapatellar disease, and 5.3% had undergone a previous amputation.

Ninety-three percent of patients were in Rutherford functional class 2 or 3; ABI was 0.61.

Read also: Resistant Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Myomectomy or Septal Ablation?

Twenty-seven percent of patients experienced in-stent restenosis, 6% suffered from severe calcification, 54% had total occlusions, diameter stenosis was 90% and lesion length was 174 mm.

Sixteen percent of patients required stenting due to residual lesion >50%, flow-compromising dissections, or a gradient >10mmHg, with a provisional stent length of 156.1 mm.

At 60 months, the SEP was 76%, clinically driven TLR freedom was 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.0% to 84.5%), and the occurrence of the first episode of clinically driven TLR was at 155±49 days.

There was no device-related mortality at 30 days.

Read also: FRAME-AMI: FFR vs. Angiography of Non-Culprit Vessel in ACS.

The presence of MAE or all-cause mortality at 5 years was 38.1% and 19.9%, respectively. No patient underwent amputation and only one patient had thrombosis. 

All patients improved their functional class of claudication. Furthermore, more than half of them did not present claudication and improved their quality of life.

Conclusion

This analysis of an Asian population within the IN.PACT Global Study showed results consistent with previously reported data from the IN.PACT Admiral. These data confirm the durable clinical effectiveness and 5-year safety of DCBs for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease in this “real-world” population.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board o SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Long‐term outcomes after paclitaxel‐coated balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal arteries in Asian patients of the IN.PACT Global Study.

Reference: Young‐Guk, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:1273–1283.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...