TAVR and New Onset LBBB

The safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is already established. However, it still poses a challenge for conduction disturbances, such as the need for pacemaker or new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB). The current rate for the latter ranges from approximately 11% to 19%.

TAVI y nuevo bloqueo completo de rama izquierda

In most cases, 50% of LBBB reverses in the first 24 to 48 hours after implantation, but if it is definitive, plenty of evidence suggests that it would have a deleterious effect, increasing morbidity and deteriorating ventricular function.

This study included 612 patients who received a SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve between 2015 and 2018 at the Cleveland Clinic. Among them, 70 had LBBB (11.4%).

Patient mean age was 80 years; 54% of patients were men, 89% had hypertension, 3% had diabetes, 2% required dialysis, 28% had undergone PCI, 20% had undergone CRM, 12.9% had a stroke, and 37% had COPD. Ejection fraction was preserved. 

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality score was 5.7%.

Those who developed new onset LBBB had a higher QRS (97.3 ± 9.9 vs.93.5 ± 10.9 ms; p = 0.005), and greater implant depth (3.5 ± 2 vs. 2.2 ± 1.8 mm; p < 0.001), and more frequently received a 29-mm valve (41.4% vs. 22.3%; p = 0.003).

The rates of in-hospital stay were higher for those with new onset LBBB.

Read also: IN.PACT Study | Should We Start Using DCBs More Frequently in Cases of Femoropopliteal Disease?

At 30 days and at 1 year, the need for a permanent pacemaker was greater in those who experienced new onset LBBB (18.6% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001 and 23.2% vs. 7%; p = 0.030, respectively).

There were no differences in mortality at 30 days, a year, and 3 years of follow-up.

At 12 months, hospitalizations for heart failure were higher in those with new onset LBBB (10.7% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.033).

Left ventricular ejection fraction at 30 days and at 1 year was lower in those who developed new onset LBBB (55.9 ± 11.4% vs. 9%; p = 0.026 and 12% vs. 60.1 ± 8.9%; = 0.002 respectively), regardless of whether they had an ejection fraction > or < 50%, as well as end-diastolic indexed volume (51.4 ± 18.6 vs. 46.4 ± 15.1 ml/ M2; p = 0.036) and end-systole indexed volume (23.2 ± 14.1 vs. 18.9 ± 9.7 ml/m2; p = 0.009).

Read also: Resistant Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Myomectomy or Septal Ablation?

In a multivariate regression analysis, implant depth was the only predictor of new onset LBBB.

Conclusion

New onset LBBB after TAVR with SAPIEN 3 was associated with increased need for permanent pacemaker, worse left ventricular function, larger ventricular volumes, and increased rates of hospitalization due to heart failure, with no difference in mortality.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with new‐onset left bundle branch block after SAPIEN‐3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Reference: Yasser M. Sammour, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101:187–196.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....