ESC 2023 | Extended Monotherapy with Clopidogrel vs. DAPT in High-Risk Patients

An increasing number of patients currently present both an elevated ischemic risk and hemorrhagic risk. This means that the selection of the optimal antiplatelet treatment is a clinical challenge. Several studies have shown that P2Y12 monotherapy after minimum dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a novel strategy to reduce bleeding risk without increasing ischemic risk. Furthermore, extending P2Y12 monotherapy beyond 9-12 months might be a reasonable strategy for patients with high hemorrhagic and ischemic risk, although this has not been studied.

ESC 2023 | Monoterapia extendida con clopidogrel vs DAPT en pacientes de alto riesgo

The objective of this multicenter, retrospective study was to assess clopidogrel monotherapy compared with DAPT (clopidogrel + aspirin) after 9-12 months of DAPT treatment in patients with high hemorrhagic and ischemic risk. 

The primary endpoint (PEP) was the rate of BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding after 9 months of randomization. The secondary endpoint (SEP) was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE).

Researchers randomized a total of 77,758 patients; 3873 of them received clopidogrel + placebo, and 3885 received clopidogrel + aspirin. The mean age was 64 years, and most patients were men. The most frequent clinical presentation was unstable angina in around 60% of patients, followed by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (approximately 20%), and finally non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (between 16-18%). The most frequently affected artery was the left anterior descending artery in over half of the cases, followed by the right coronary artery. Regarding lesion morphology, 80% of patients presented diffuse disease, and a quarter of the patients had small vessel disease.

Read also: ESC 2023 | FIRE-Trial: Physiology Guided Complete Revascularization Benefits Elderly Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

Regarding the PEP, the rate of BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding was 3.3% in the clopidogrel + aspirin group vs. 2.5% in the clopidogrel + placebo group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57-0.97; P = 0.03). As for the SEP, the MACCE rate in the clopidogrel + aspirin group was 3.5% vs. 2.6% in the clopidogrel + placebo group (HR: 0.74; 95% CI = 0.57-0.96; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Among acute coronary syndrome patients with high hemorrhagic and ischemic risk who completed 12 months of DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention, extended monotherapy with clopidogrel was superior to DAPT treatment in significantly reducing hemorrhagic events and MACCE. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Extended clopidogrel monotherapy versus DAPT in high-risk patients: the OPT-BIRISK trial.

Reference: Yaling Han, MD, FESC et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...