TCT 2023 | COMPARE 60/80 HBR TRIAL

This was a randomized study including patients at high risk of bleeding treated with short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). 

TCT 2023 | SWEDEHEART, evolución  a 5 años

A total 747 patients were recruited, 368 received PCI with the ultrathin Superflex stent with 60 µm struts (SUF), and 364 received the Terumo Tansei with 89 µm struts (SF).

Primary end point was NACE at 12 months.

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Patient mean age was 74, 29% had diabetes, 75% presented more than one high risk criteria and 50% presented more than two.

Ultravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was used in 4% of cases and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 1%. 

Read also: TCT 2023 | Reestenosis intrastent: balones liberadores de sirolimus vs. balones liberadores de paclitaxel.

At 12 months, NACE rate resulted 15.4% for the SUF group and 17.2% for SF (Hazard Ratio 0.89, CI 95% 0.62-1.28, p for Log-rank = 0.52, p for non-inferiority = 0.02, p for superiority = 0.55). There were no differences as regards cardiac death, MI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, major bleeding, the set of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE), TVF, TLF, TLR or definite/probable stent. 

In sum, the study authors concluded that stents with ultrathin struts are non-inferior vs. stents with thin struts. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Presented by Pieter C Smits during TCT 2023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...