TCT 2023 | TRILUMINATE Trial: Health Status after TriClip

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has been associated with higher mortality, increased risk of hospitalization for cardiac failure (CF), reduced functionality and poor health status.  Tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) with TriClip effectively reduces TR with low risk of post-procedural complications. 

TCT 2023 | SWEDEHEART, evolución  a 5 años

The TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Treated with the Tricuspid Valve Repair System Pivotal) compared T-TEER against medical treatment and did not find differences in mortality or CF related hospitalization at 1 year, but did observe improved health status with T-TEER.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter and randomized study was to assess the benefit of T-TEER in health status. 

Health status was measured by the Kansas questionnaire (KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) based on time reference points: at kickoff, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year. 

Read also: TCT 2023 The LIFE-BTK Trial.

A total 350 patients were randomized: 175 to receiving T-TEER and 175 to medical treatment (MT). Mean age was 78, and most patients were women. At 1 month, T-TEER resulted in improved health status and showed continuous improvement at 1 year, vs. MT. Patients undergoing T-TEER saw better survival and good health status at one year, vs MT patients (74,8% vs. 45,9%, p<0,001) with necessary number to treat (NNT) 3.5.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this study, patients treated with T-TEER experienced improved health status vs patients receiving MT alone, and this improvement was more evident in patients with symptomatic TR. Improved health status was more evident at 1 month and was maintained at 1 year followup. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Health Status after Transcatheter Tricuspid-Valve Repair in Patients with Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Results from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal Trial.

Reference: Suzanne V. Arnold, MD MHA et al TCT 2023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....