Drug-Coated Balloons (DCB): Sirolimus vs. Paclitaxel in De Novo Lesions in Small Vessels

The use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) offers the advantage of avoiding permanent stent implants, thus reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR), neoatherosclerosis, and late in-stent thrombosis. Additionally, the use of DCB reduces the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Balones cubiertos de fármacos (DCB): Sirolimus vs Paclitaxel en lesiones de novo en vasos pequeños

Current evidence supports the use of DCB for ISR treatment (Class I) compared with drug-eluting stents (DES), and there is also evidence in favor of its application in small vessel disease (SVD). The most studied DCBs are paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB), and there is no data on sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB).

The aim of this prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study was to compare quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months in the treatment of SVD with PCB versus SCB. The primary endpoint (PEP) was minimal lumen diameter (MLD) within the DCB-treated area.

Researchers analyzed a total of 109 patients with 117 treated lesions, with 61 lesions randomized to SCB and 56 lesions to PCB. The mean age was 70 years in the SCB group and 67 years in the PCB group. Most patients were men. The most frequently treated arteries were the diagonal branch (23%) and the marginal branch (23%).

Read also: Cilostazol in Diabetic Patients with Endovascular Peripheral Revascularization: One Step Beyond Symptom Improvement.

Regarding the results, the mean MLD was 0.25 ± 0.40 mm with SCB versus 0.48 ± 0.37 mm with PCB, failing to meet the non-inferiority criterion (P non-inferiority = 0.173). The restenosis rate was 32.8% for the SCB group and 12.5% for the PCB group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-9.44; P = 0.012).

Conclusion

This randomized study has demonstrated that SCB does not achieve non-inferiority compared with PCB in angiographic outcomes at 6 months. Long-term studies with a larger number of patients are needed to increase statistical power and determine the efficacy of SCB compared with PCB in de novo lesions.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Sirolimus-Coated Balloon With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in De Novo Small Vessels.

Reference: Kai Ninomiya, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...