Long-term Results of Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Treatment in Diabetic Patients

The effects of diabetes on patients with coronary artery disease are well-known, and their outcomes after angioplasty are less favorable, with a higher rate of restenosis, recurrent acute myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents and procedural techniques, the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions in diabetic patients shows less positive clinical outcomes and a lower procedural success rate compared with the treatment of non-complex coronary lesions.

Resultados a largo plazo del tratamiento de bifurcaciones coronarias en pacientes diabéticos 

The objective of this retrospective, observational, real-world cohort study was to explore the impact of diabetes on the outcomes of coronary transluminal angioplasty (CTA) in bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation stents, as well as to assess the predictors of adverse events during follow-up among diabetic patients.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a combination of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, or treated lesion revascularization (TLR).

The analysis included 5537 patients, of which 33% had diabetes. Diabetic patients were older and had a higher prevalence of renal disease (p <0.001), hypertension (p <0.001), dyslipidemia (p <0.001), prior acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.02), previous percutaneous coronary intervention (p <0.001), and previous coronary revascularization surgery (p = 0.006). Angiographically, this patient group showed a higher incidence of diffuse disease (p <0.001) and severe calcification (p <0.001), while there were no differences in left main coronary artery involvement and Medina classification.

Regarding the results, at 21 months, the MACE rate was significantly higher in diabetic patients (17% vs. 9%, p <0.001). The same applied to the incidence of all-cause death (9% vs. 4%, p <0.001), TLR (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (4% vs. 2%, p <0.001), and stent thrombosis (2% vs. 1%, p = 0.007).

Leia também: Escores de qualidade de vida após intervenção percutânea em insuficiência tricúspide: análise do estudo TRILUMINATE.

Regarding the predictors of MACE among diabetics, chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.99; confidence interval [CI]: 2.21–4.04, p <0.001), baseline ejection fraction (HR: 0.98; CI: 0.97–0.99, p = 0.04), femoral access (HR: 1.62; CI: 1.23–2.15, p = 0.001), left main coronary artery involvement (HR: 1.44; CI: 1.06–1.94, p = 0.02), main branch diameter (HR: 0.79; CI: 0.66–0.94, p = 0.01), and final kissing balloon (HR: 0.70; CI: 0.52–0.93, p = 0.01) were independent predictors of MACE during follow-up.

Conclusion

In conclusion, diabetic patients undergoing CTA in bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents experienced a higher incidence of MACE, all-cause death, TLR, and stent thrombosis compared with non-diabetic patients.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Membro do Conselho Editorial da SOLACI.org.

Título Original: Angioplastia coronaria. Impact of diabetes on long‐term outcomes of bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention. An analysis from the BIFURCAT registry.

Referência: Francesco Bruno MD et al Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;1–11. 


Subscreva-se a nossa newsletter semanal

Receba resumos com os últimos artigos científicos

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...