EuroPCR 2024 | Specific Intracoronary Tests Combined with Angiography for Diagnosing Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome: The AID-ANGIO Study

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) has become the gold standard for the assessment of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) for obstructive coronary artery disease. However, its ability to detect this condition is limited and it does not detect non-obstructive myocardial ischemia, which can be overlooked.

EuroPCR 2024

To address these limitations, a prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance of advanced invasive diagnosis (AID), which included measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance, and the acetylcholine test, to identify both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischemia in patients with CCS.

The primary endpoint (PEP) of the study was to determine the proportion of patients whose cause of myocardial ischemia was identified using ICA alone compared with ICA + AID.

As a secondary endpoint (SEP), the study assessed the proportion of patients in whom ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) was identified, and the proportion of cases in which AID facilitated the modification of the initial therapeutic plan.

Read also: EuroPCR 2024 | Influence and Effect of CAD Physiopathological Patterns in the Safety and Efficacy of PCI.

The study included 317 patients; most of them were men with an average age of 66 years. Most experienced angina symptoms and around 60% had positive non-invasive ischemia tests. There were complications in a low percentage of cases, mainly related to iatrogenic dissection (0.6%) and ventricular arrhythmias (0.3%), with no events of death or myocardial infarction.

Results showed that ICA alone identified the cause of ischemia in only 32% of patients, while AID identified it in 84% of cases, a significant increase in diagnostic performance compared to ICA alone (p <0.001). Additionally, AID identified a 45-% prevalence of INOCA, and only 16% of all patients undergoing ICA showed no abnormalities. AID also resulted in a change in the initial therapeutic plan in nearly 60% of cases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, AID proved to be a safe and effective strategy for the identification of the causes of myocardial ischemia in more than 80% of patients with CCS, leading to changes in the initial therapeutic plan in most cases.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Combining angiography and pre-specified intracoronary testing in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: the AID-ANGIO study.

Reference: Adrian Jeronimo et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...