ESC 2024 | RHEIA Trial: Transcatheter vs. Surgical Replacement in Women

The RHEIA trial is the first randomized, women-exclusive international study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgery in symptomatic women with severe aortic stenosis. It excluded patients with bicuspid aortic valve, non-calcified valve, complex coronary artery disease, or with predictors of complications for TAVI or surgery.

El estudio incluyó a 443 pacientes, aleatorizados 1:1 para recibir TAVI con dispositivos Sapien 3/3U o cirugía con cualquier válvula disponible. El punto final primario fue la incidencia de eventos adversos a un año, incluyendo mortalidad, accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) y rehospitalización.

The study enrolled 443 patients, randomized 1:1 to receive TAVI with Sapien 3/3U devices or surgery with any available valve. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events at one year, including mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization.

The average age of the participants was 73 years, and they were at low risk (STS score 2.2). Between 70-75% of the women had a small aortic annulus (<430 mm²). The primary endpoint showed an event rate of 15.6% in the surgical group versus 8.9% in the TAVI group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.88; Log-rank p=0.03). This showed both non-inferiority and superiority for TAVI in the studied events.

Breaking down the primary endpoint, the TAVI group had lower rates of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization in particular. In terms of safety, the TAVI group had a higher incidence of vascular complications (3.3% vs. 0.5%; p=0.007) and need for pacemaker (8.8% vs. 2.9%; p=0.001), and a lower rate of atrial fibrillation (-25.5%; p<0.001).

Read also: ESC 2024 | NOTION 3 Trial: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with a Planned Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

The authors concluded that treatment with the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra devices showed superiority regarding the primary endpoint, with fewer rehospitalizations and less use of inpatient resources compared to surgery.

Presented by Helene Eltchaninoff at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...