Recently Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the FORCE-ACS Registry

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common condition in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). About 10% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have AF, while 25%-35% of patients with AF have coronary artery disease. The joint management of both conditions poses a significant challenge, as the combination of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), known as triple therapy, is associated with a high risk of bleeding complications.

There is limited information regarding the prognosis and optimal antithrombotic treatment in patients with newly diagnosed AF during ACS. Observational studies have shown that these patients with AF and ACS often receive inadequate treatment, as OAC is not always prescribed. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether newly diagnosed AF entails a higher risk of thromboembolic events.

The aim of this multicenter, prospective study was to assess the incidence of de novo AF in patients with ACS, compare clinical outcomes between those without AF, subjects with de novo AF, and those with known AF, and analyze antithrombotic treatment in relation to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with particular attention to stroke.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was the rate for MACE, defined as all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and ischemic stroke. The secondary endpoint (SEP) included ischemic stroke and bleeding complications.

Read also: ESC 2024 | REC-CAGEREE I Trial: Drug Coated Balloon with Bailout Stenting vs. Intended DES for de Novo Lesion Treatment.

The study included 4433 patients with ACS, of whom 81.2% had no AF, 9.9% had newly diagnosed AF, and 9% had known AF. Patients with newly diagnosed AF and known AF were older and had more comorbidities compared with those without AF (mean age 71, 74, and 65 years, respectively; p < 0.001). The rate of OAC treatment at discharge was 53.4% in patients with de novo AF and 89.2% in patients with known AF.

De novo AF was independently associated with an increased rate of MACE, whereas known AF did not evidence this association (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.90 vs. HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.70-1.23). In patients diagnosed with ACS and newly onset AF, AF episodes lasting longer than 24 hours were associated with a higher risk of MACE compared with episodes lasting less than 24 hours (HR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.36-2.93).

Conclusion

In patients with ACS, newly diagnosed AF was associated with worse outcomes in terms of MACE and ischemic stroke. In those with newly diagnosed AF, AF episodes lasting longer than 24 hours were linked to worse outcomes compared with shorter episodes. Additionally, only half of the patients with de novo AF were discharged with OAC, in contrast to more than 90% of patients with known AF.

Original Title: Outcomes of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Reference: Willem Lambertus (Wilbert) Bor, MD et al EuroIntervention 2024;20:996-1007.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

TCT 2024 | Distal Radial vs Transradial Approach in STEMI Patients

The transradial approach (TRA) has been recommended for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for reduced bleeding complications and mortality. However, evidence in support...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

TCT 2024 | Distal Radial vs Transradial Approach in STEMI Patients

The transradial approach (TRA) has been recommended for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for reduced bleeding complications and mortality. However, evidence in support...