Asymmetry in the Implantation of Self-Expanding Valves in TAVR: Evolution at 5 Years

Severe aortic stenosis is frequently associated with significant and irregular calcification, which tends to be more present in the non-coronary sinus. Incomplete valve expansion, observable through fluoroscopy after implantation, can lead to alterations in the hemodynamic profile and favor structural deterioration of the percutaneous aortic valve.

Currently, both the true impact of incomplete expansion and the degree of expansion required to result in hemodynamic alterations or future adverse events remain unclear.

In this context, researchers conducted an analysis on 1216 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with SAPIEN or SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable valves. The asymmetry index was assessed using the following formula (%): (greater height/lesser height) – 1 × 100. The result was considered high when it exceeded 5.5%.

A high asymmetry index (HAI) was observed in 206 patients (17.2%). Average patient age was 81 years, and 34% of subjects were women, with an STS mortality risk score of 4.3%. Most patients were functional class III-IV.

Seven percent of cases involved bicuspid valves, with an aortic valve area of 0.78 cm² and an ejection fraction of 55%. The average annular diameter was 25 mm. Patients with a HAI had higher gradients (65 mmHg vs. 60 mmHg for peak gradient and 43 mmHg vs. 39 mmHg for mean gradient, respectively).

Read also: Aortic Stenosis with High Gradients and Area >1: Just Follow Up?

A mean gradient ≥20 mmHg was more frequent in patients with HAI (18.7% [n = 39] vs. 1.2% [n = 12]; odds ratio [OR]: 19.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.32-40.16; P <0.001), and so was the presence of moderate to higher paravalvular leak (5.7% [n = 12] vs. 0.3% [n = 3]; OR: 19.70; 95% CI: 5.35-72.58; P <0.001).

In the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, asymmetry proved to be an excellent predictor of hemodynamic performance alterations in balloon-expandable valves (0.88; 95% CI: 0.84-0.92; P <0.001), with a cut-off point >5%, which had a 77-% sensitivity and an 86-% specificity.

Structural deterioration was similar between groups (3.9% vs. 3.6%; OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.51-2.86; P = 0.670). At 30 days, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality (1.4% vs. 1.7% and 1% vs. 1.3%, respectively). There were also no differences in the incidence of mortality and stroke at one year.

Read also: SCAAR Registry: Coronary Angioplasty in Venous Grafts.

At 5 years of follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or cardiac mortality (21.1% vs. 26.2% and 13.9% vs. 17.6%, for HAI and for those without asymmetry, respectively).

Conclusion

The asymmetric expansion of balloon-expandable valves was associated with hemodynamic alterations in their functioning but did not impact long-term clinical outcomes.

Original Title: Asymmetrical Expansion of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses Implications for Valve Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes.

Reference: Annette Maznyczka, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17:2011–2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

TAVR in Young Low-Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has established itself as an effective strategy for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis across different risk groups. While previous...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Impact of Iliofemoral Disease on Post TAVR Clinical Outcomes: HOSTILE Score Validation

At present, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown safe and effective for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in high-surgical-risk patients. Moreover, its...

Aortic Stenosis with High Gradients and Area >1: Just Follow Up?

Definig severe aortic stenosis (AS) rests upon Doppler parameters, and uses log-established cutoff values, which include peak velocity (PV) ≥ 4 m/s, mean gradient...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

TCT 2024 | Distal Radial vs Transradial Approach in STEMI Patients

The transradial approach (TRA) has been recommended for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for reduced bleeding complications and mortality. However, evidence in support...