COMPARE TAVI: One-Year Results of a Randomized Study Comapring Two Balloon-Expandable Valves

The COMPARE TAVI organization conducted direct comparison of new transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices against contemporary best practices. To that end, it conducted a study that included an all-comers population (that is with no strict exclusion) to assess short-term safety and long-term durability, and to extrapolate data representative of the general population.

The analyzed cohort involved TAVI procedures using balloon-expandable valves: Sapien (Sapien 3 and Sapien 3 Ultra) versus Myval (Myval and Myval Octacor). Selected patients underwent transfemoral access, and procedures were performed in accredited centers with a minimum of ≥75 implantation procedures annually by experienced operators.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of death, stroke, moderate/severe aortic regurgitation, and moderate/severe valve deterioration at one year. Upon demonstrating non-inferiority between devices, TAVI-related complications, implant success, and need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation were evaluated.

The study included a total of 1031 patients from three high-volume centers in Denmark (750 TAVI procedures annually). The average age was 81.1 years; 40% of subjects were women, and 79% had an STS score <4.

Read also: Sievers Type 1 Bicuspid Valves: Which to Use?

In the balloon-expandable valve analysis, the Sapien group had a 13% incidence of the PEP, compared to 13.6% in the Myval group, with a risk difference of -0.9% (p=0.02), confirming non-inferiority between both groups after one year of follow-up.

An analysis of individual PEP components showed a higher trend towards moderate/severe aortic regurgitation and increased PPM implantation in the Myval group. Regarding secondary endpoints, the Sapien group had a higher incidence of moderate to severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors’ conclusion: Myval was non-inferior to Sapien concerning the evaluated PEP.

Presented by Henrik Nissen at Top Late-Breaking Trials, PCR London Valves, November 24, 2024, London, Great Britain.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...