ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we continue anticoagulation therapy while cancer remains active or under treatment. 

ACC 2025

The authors hypothesis is that the use of a reduced dose of anticoagulants might offer similar benefits in terms of efficacy and better safety vs. standard doses when treating cancer related VTE. 

To assess this hypothesis, a double blind and non-inferiority randomized study was carried out, for the prevention of recurrent VTE, as well as a superiority analysis to assess clinically relevant bleeding. Patients were randomized to receiving apixaban reduce dose (2.5 mg twice a day) vs standard (5 mg twice a day), and were stratified according to cancer type and venous thromboembolic compromise (PE with or without DVT or isolated DVT). 

Primary end points at 12 months were:

  • Efficacy primary end point: VTE recurrence (symptomatic recurrence, incidental VTE or VTE related death).
  • Bleeding related secondary end points: major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. 

1,766 patients from 121 centers in 11 countries were included. Mean patient age was 67.4; 43.4% were men, 43.4% had a history of VTE, and 75.5% presented proximal PE±DVT. Breast cancer was the most frequent (22.7%), followed by colorectal (15.3%), with 65.8% of cases presenting metastasis. 

Read also: STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes.

The efficacy primary end point showed non-inferiority for reduced vs standard dose (HR 0.76 [0.41-1.41]; p for non-inferiority = 0.001). As regards the safety secondary end point, reduced dose patients saw a significant reduction of 25% in hemorrhagic event incidence (HR 0.75; CI 95% 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in mortality (HR 0.96; CI 95% 0.86-1.06; p = 0.42).

Conclusions

Cancer patients completing six months of anticoagulation therapy with apixaban reduced dose did not show non-inferiority vs standard dose in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events and presented a better safety profile. 

Presented by Isabelle Mahé in Late-Breaking Clinical Trials ACC 25, march 29, Chicago, EE.UU.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....