EuroPCR 2025 | Angiography- vs. Physiology-Guided PCI in TAVI Candidates (FAITAVI)

Coronary artery disease is present in 50 to 70% of TAVI candidates and over 90% of these patients do not present angina or evidence of ischemia.

The aim of the FAITAVI study was to assess whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of lesions deemed physiologically significant in TAVI candidates could be beneficial or harmful.

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, superiority trial, including 320 patients randomized 1:1. The decision to perform PCI (either before or after TAVI) was based on the presence of ≥50% stenosis by angiography or ≤0.80 FFR by physiological assessment.

Mean patient age was 86. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemia-driven revascularization, stroke, or major bleeding at 12 months.

FFR-guided PCI reduced the primary composite outcome by 48% (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27–0.99; P=0.047). When evaluating the primary outcome individual components,  there were reductions in all-cause mortality (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10–0.96) and stroke incidence (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.03–2.11).

Read also: Hyper-Adducted Right Radial Access vs. Left Radial Access: Aiming for Lower Daily Radiation Exposure.

The authors concluded that the FFR-guided strategy significantly reduced adverse events at 12 months. FAITAVI provides supporting evidence for the use of physiological assessment in the elderly and frail population usually considered for TAVI.

Presented by Flavio Ribichini during the Major Late Breaking Trials session, EuroPCR 2025, May 21, Paris, France.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....