Long-Term Outcomes of PFO Closure

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a recognized cause of cryptogenic stroke, and its closure via percutaneous treatment has been shown to be effective compared to medical therapy, according to several randomized studies with follow-ups of up to 5 and even 10 years. However, beyond this period, available data are limited.

cierre de PFO

Using the PROLONG registry, researchers conducted an analysis that included 1245 patients who underwent percutaneous PFO closure after experiencing cryptogenic ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolism, or silent ischemic lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging.

Mean patient age was 47 years; 56% of subjects were women. Hypertension was present in 22% of cases, diabetes in 3.1%, smoking in 14%, a history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in 4.7%, and migraine in 32%.

The average RoPE score was 6.2, and 42% of the cases were classified as “probable” according to the PASCAL category.

The most frequent indication for PFO closure was TIA (52%), followed by ischemic stroke (36%), and to a lesser extent by silent ischemic lesions and systemic embolism.

The procedure was successful in 99.1% of cases. There were no instances of in-hospital death, stroke, or cardiac tamponade reported.

Read also: Post-TAVR Pacemaker Implantation in Aortic Regurgitation.

The follow-up period was 14.5 years. During this time, mortality was 4.7%; the composite event of stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism occurred in 2.7% of cases, stroke in 1.4%, severe bleeding in 0.4%, and new-onset atrial fibrillation in 4.2%. Residual shunting was mild in 8.1%, moderate in 0.9%, and severe in 0.1% of cases.

Predictors of recurrent events included the presence of atrial fibrillation, a RoPE score ≤7, and a non-probable PASCAL category.

Conclusion

This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure in patients with cryptogenic embolism in a real-world setting.

Original Title: 15-Year Outcomes of PFO Closure in Patients With Cryptogenic Embolism Insights From the PROLONG Registry

Reference: Carlo Gaspardone, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025;18:1526–1537. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...