Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during the first month. However, its true frequency remains uncertain due to the lack of continuous monitoring prior to the intervention.

PFO

This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the true incidence and timing of AF onset after PFO closure, using continuous implantable cardiac monitoring (ICM) before and after the procedure. The primary endpoint was detection of the first AF episode lasting >30 seconds at 30 days and at one year after closure. Secondary endpoints included the clinical and therapeutic characteristics of these episodes: symptoms, need for antiarrhythmic treatment or anticoagulation, and event duration.

Researchers included a total of 126 consecutive patients (mean age 57.2±11.5 years; 38.9% women) treated at Toulouse University Hospital between January 2015 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were high-risk PFO (≥25 microbubbles on contrast echocardiography, atrial septal aneurysm with >15 mm excursion, or PFO width >2 mm) associated with a cryptogenic embolic event. Patients with AF detected on pre-implantation ICM or without post-procedural monitoring were excluded. The most commonly used closure devices were the Amplatzer PFO Occluder (60.3%) and the Amplatzer Cribriform Septal Occluder (34.1%); the left disc was ≤25 mm in 84.1% of cases.

Read also: Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation.

Patients were monitored using ICM for a median of 8.6 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5–11.7) before closure, confirming the absence of pre-existing AF. Reveal devices (Medtronic) were used in 86.5% of cases. Post-procedural follow-up had a median duration of 5.8 months (IQR 3.3–11.3).

During the first year, 32 patients (27.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.1–37.1) experienced AF; in 24 cases, the onset (19.3%; 95% CI: 13.4–27.4) occurred within the first 30 days. The median time to the first episode was 20.5 days (IQR 15.5–44.0). All episodes were paroxysmal; 56.3% lasted less than one hour. Only 15.6% were symptomatic, and a similar proportion required antiarrhythmic therapy, while 78.1% required oral anticoagulation.

Read also: AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease.

Most episodes occurred within the first month, supporting the hypothesis of a mechanism related to device-induced atrial irritation or stretch. However, 25% occurred beyond 30 days despite exclusion of prior AF, suggesting a possible late device-related effect on the atrium.

Early and late atrial fibrillation episodes after PFO closure: clinical and therapeutic implications

In this cohort with comprehensive pre- and post-closure monitoring, the true incidence of post-procedural AF was high (19.3% at 30 days and 27.6% at one year), although mostly asymptomatic and paroxysmal. The findings question the need for routine antiarrhythmic therapy—potentially reserving it for symptomatic cases—and highlight the importance of prolonged monitoring to identify late episodes potentially induced by the device.

Original Title: Atrial fibrillation following patent foramen ovale closure: a cohort study with continuous implantable cardiac monitoring.

Reference: Paul Gautier, MD, MSc; et al. EuroIntervention 2025;21:e1–e3. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00603. Toulouse University Hospital, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...