How Important Is Controlling Risk Factors for the Prevention of a Stroke?

How Important Is Controlling Risk Factors for the Prevention of a Stroke?There has been a recent decline of about 20% to 40% in the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (stroke). Although this is attributed to the improvement of risk factor control, the reason behind it is not utterly clear. This study estimated the impact of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors on the incidence of stroke between 1995 and 2012.

 

The risk of ischemic stroke was estimated by proportional regression among 26,329 participants in the register. The estimate was adjusted for unmodifiable risk factors such as age and gender.

 

There were 1226 new stroke cases per 36,7636 person-years of follow-up. Changes in risk factors accounted for 57% of the decrease in the incidence of this event from 1995 to 2012. The two factors that contributed the most to incidence decrease were systolic blood pressure (decreased by 26%) and smoking prevalence (decreased by 17%). Conversely, increasing diabetes prevalence contributed negatively to stroke incidence.

 

Conclusion

Changes in cardiovascular risk factors accounted for 57% of the decrease in stroke incidence. Reduction in systolic blood pressure and prevalence of smoking were the most important contributors.

 

Original title: Declining Incidence of Ischemic Stroke. What Is the Impact of Changing Risk Factors? The Tromso Study 1995 to 2012.

Reference: Anne M. Vangen-Lonne et al. Stroke. 2017 Feb 10. [Epub ahead of print].


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be the third cause of cardiovascular mortality. The current clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation in intermediate risk patients presenting right...

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: To Revascularize or Not

At long term, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) can lead to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. Historically, these patients have been referred...

Endovascular Management of Chronic TEPH: Is Coronary Management Extrapolatable in This Scenario?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition that causes significant functional limitation. Its surgical treatment, known as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), has improved the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...