How Important Is Controlling Risk Factors for the Prevention of a Stroke?

How Important Is Controlling Risk Factors for the Prevention of a Stroke?There has been a recent decline of about 20% to 40% in the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (stroke). Although this is attributed to the improvement of risk factor control, the reason behind it is not utterly clear. This study estimated the impact of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors on the incidence of stroke between 1995 and 2012.

 

The risk of ischemic stroke was estimated by proportional regression among 26,329 participants in the register. The estimate was adjusted for unmodifiable risk factors such as age and gender.

 

There were 1226 new stroke cases per 36,7636 person-years of follow-up. Changes in risk factors accounted for 57% of the decrease in the incidence of this event from 1995 to 2012. The two factors that contributed the most to incidence decrease were systolic blood pressure (decreased by 26%) and smoking prevalence (decreased by 17%). Conversely, increasing diabetes prevalence contributed negatively to stroke incidence.

 

Conclusion

Changes in cardiovascular risk factors accounted for 57% of the decrease in stroke incidence. Reduction in systolic blood pressure and prevalence of smoking were the most important contributors.

 

Original title: Declining Incidence of Ischemic Stroke. What Is the Impact of Changing Risk Factors? The Tromso Study 1995 to 2012.

Reference: Anne M. Vangen-Lonne et al. Stroke. 2017 Feb 10. [Epub ahead of print].


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...