Ambulatory Coronary Angiography: Is any further evidence required?

Original title: Same-Day Discharge Compared With Overnight Hospitalization After Uncomplicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reference: Eltigani Abdelaal et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013. Article in press.

Coronary angioplasty and subsequent same day discharge in selected patients can reduce costs and increase patient comfort. 

Several observational studies and a few randomized studies have described the safety of same day discharge, however, opinions still vary extensively among the different centers. In an attempt to answer these questions, a meta analysis was carried out to evaluate the total incidence of complications, major cardiovascular events (MACE) and rehospitalization at 30 days.

13 studies were analyzed (5 randomized and 8 observational) with a total of 111830 patients. 96% of procedures were approach by femoral access and 83% of patients were discharged the same day. The median permanence time of same day discharged patients was 4 to 8 hrs.

In randomized studies there were no significant differences in the total number of complications between same day discharged patients and those patients that remained hospitalized (6.5% vs. 5.5% respectively; OR:1.2, 95% IC:0.82 -1.01). At 30 days, MACE incidence in randomized studies was identical in both groups (1.3%), rehospitalizations show no differences as well (4% vs. 3.6%; OR 1.1, 95%IC: 0.7-1.7). Observational studies reached similar conclusions in all the above mentioned.

Conclusion:

The heterogeneous nature of these studies call for a randomized study to assess the correct strategy. Until then, same day discharge after non complicated angioplasty is reasonable in selected patients.

Editorial Comment: 

The randomized study that in theory would be necessary to reach a definite valid conclusion should include more than 17,000 patients to reach enough statistic power seeing the low frequency of these events. It is highly unlikely that we will count on this information in a near future, if ever available. Even though the use of the radial artery is less than 5%, if we exclude the analysis of observational studies performed in the USA (Rao et al., among others) the radial approach reaches almost 50% of cases, which speaks for the low preference of this approach in this country. Seeing the main reasons behind same day discharge are cost reduction and patient comfort, the radial approach seems the most sensible choice.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...