Critical limb ischemia, always try to revascularize

Original title: Endovascular Treatment for Infrainguinal Vessels in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia : OLIVE Registry, a Prospective, Multicenter Study in Japan With 12-Month Follow-up. Reference: Osamu Iida et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:00-00

Patients with critical limb ischemia typically reveal rest pain and ischemic ulcers or gangrene. Prognosis is poor and mortality and amputation rate are elevated. Bypass surgery has been the gold standard to revascularize those patients, however in real life, critical ischemia is associated with multiple comorbidities that increase the surgical risk.

OLIVE Registry is a prospective multicenter year follow-up study that evaluated the results of percutaneous revascularization in critical ischemia patients and infrainguinal lesions. 314 patients presenting critical isquemia were included, 71% were diabetic, 52% had renal failure and required dialysis and 88% revealed ulcers with tissue loss. 41% of them had lesions below knee and the remaining 42%, femoropopliteal lesions with at least one permeable vessel along the foot. After revascularization at least one direct flow line to the foot was achieved resulting in 93%.

Amputation-free survival was 81% at 6 months and 74% at 12 months. The average time between revascularization and complete healing of the wounds was 97 days. 34% required reoperation at follow up (2.6% and 31.7% new angioplasty).

Conclusion: 

Despite a high rate of reoperations especially for lesions below the knee, percutaneous revascularization was useful in patients with critical ischemia of limb and infrainguinal lesions.

Editorial comment: 

The relatively short period of time (20 months) of those patients included, made the materials used homogeneous throughout the registry and reflect the latest advances in endovascular therapy. This study shows the real life of patients with this disease where several and severe comorbidities are present, making it difficult to think of surgery as the gold standard of treatment.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...