Ambulatory Coronary Angiography: Is any further evidence required?

Original title: Same-Day Discharge Compared With Overnight Hospitalization After Uncomplicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reference: Eltigani Abdelaal et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013. Article in press.

Coronary angioplasty and subsequent same day discharge in selected patients can reduce costs and increase patient comfort. 

Several observational studies and a few randomized studies have described the safety of same day discharge, however, opinions still vary extensively among the different centers. In an attempt to answer these questions, a meta analysis was carried out to evaluate the total incidence of complications, major cardiovascular events (MACE) and rehospitalization at 30 days.

13 studies were analyzed (5 randomized and 8 observational) with a total of 111830 patients. 96% of procedures were approach by femoral access and 83% of patients were discharged the same day. The median permanence time of same day discharged patients was 4 to 8 hrs.

In randomized studies there were no significant differences in the total number of complications between same day discharged patients and those patients that remained hospitalized (6.5% vs. 5.5% respectively; OR:1.2, 95% IC:0.82 -1.01). At 30 days, MACE incidence in randomized studies was identical in both groups (1.3%), rehospitalizations show no differences as well (4% vs. 3.6%; OR 1.1, 95%IC: 0.7-1.7). Observational studies reached similar conclusions in all the above mentioned.

Conclusion:

The heterogeneous nature of these studies call for a randomized study to assess the correct strategy. Until then, same day discharge after non complicated angioplasty is reasonable in selected patients.

Editorial Comment: 

The randomized study that in theory would be necessary to reach a definite valid conclusion should include more than 17,000 patients to reach enough statistic power seeing the low frequency of these events. It is highly unlikely that we will count on this information in a near future, if ever available. Even though the use of the radial artery is less than 5%, if we exclude the analysis of observational studies performed in the USA (Rao et al., among others) the radial approach reaches almost 50% of cases, which speaks for the low preference of this approach in this country. Seeing the main reasons behind same day discharge are cost reduction and patient comfort, the radial approach seems the most sensible choice.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...