Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Ambulatory Coronary Angiography: Is any further evidence required?

Original title: Same-Day Discharge Compared With Overnight Hospitalization After Uncomplicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Reference: Eltigani Abdelaal et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013. Article in press.

Coronary angioplasty and subsequent same day discharge in selected patients can reduce costs and increase patient comfort. 

Several observational studies and a few randomized studies have described the safety of same day discharge, however, opinions still vary extensively among the different centers. In an attempt to answer these questions, a meta analysis was carried out to evaluate the total incidence of complications, major cardiovascular events (MACE) and rehospitalization at 30 days.

13 studies were analyzed (5 randomized and 8 observational) with a total of 111830 patients. 96% of procedures were approach by femoral access and 83% of patients were discharged the same day. The median permanence time of same day discharged patients was 4 to 8 hrs.

In randomized studies there were no significant differences in the total number of complications between same day discharged patients and those patients that remained hospitalized (6.5% vs. 5.5% respectively; OR:1.2, 95% IC:0.82 -1.01). At 30 days, MACE incidence in randomized studies was identical in both groups (1.3%), rehospitalizations show no differences as well (4% vs. 3.6%; OR 1.1, 95%IC: 0.7-1.7). Observational studies reached similar conclusions in all the above mentioned.

Conclusion:

The heterogeneous nature of these studies call for a randomized study to assess the correct strategy. Until then, same day discharge after non complicated angioplasty is reasonable in selected patients.

Editorial Comment: 

The randomized study that in theory would be necessary to reach a definite valid conclusion should include more than 17,000 patients to reach enough statistic power seeing the low frequency of these events. It is highly unlikely that we will count on this information in a near future, if ever available. Even though the use of the radial artery is less than 5%, if we exclude the analysis of observational studies performed in the USA (Rao et al., among others) the radial approach reaches almost 50% of cases, which speaks for the low preference of this approach in this country. Seeing the main reasons behind same day discharge are cost reduction and patient comfort, the radial approach seems the most sensible choice.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...

Calcified Nodules and Their Treatment with Rotational Atherectomy

Calcified nodules (CN) represent one of the most complex phenotypes to treat in coronary intervention. They are mainly associated with the need for repeat...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...