Decreased bleeding with radial access leaves little to bivalirudin for additional benefit

Original title: Bivalirudin or heparin in primary angioplasty performed through the transradial approach: results from a multicentre registry. Reference: Sciahbasi A et al. Eur Heart J: Acute Cardiovasc Care. Epub ahead of print.

Bivalirudin benefit has been demonstrated in terms of bleeding; however when primary angioplasty is performed by radial access this information is not clear. To get an idea of this, in the HORIZONS study only 5% of patients were performed by radial access. This study retrospectively evaluated 1009 patients undergoing primary angioplasty by radial access between January 2008 and June 2013. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use or bivalirudin. The primary end point of the study was major bleeding and major cardiovascular events at 30 days. 

At surgeon discretion provisionally, bivalirudin (n = 159) or heparin plus glycoprotein inhibitors IIb IIIa (n = 855) were used. Using glycoprotein inhibitors in bivalirudin group was 4 % versus 55 % in the heparin group (p <0.001). Procedure characteristics were similar between both groups (door ball, number of stents, total stent length, or use of thromboaspiration). At 30 days, no differences between those who received bivalirudin or heparin regarding mayor bleeding (0.65 % for bivalirudin versus 1.17 % for heparin; p = 0.88) minor bleeding (1.3% versus 1.5% respectively; p=0.83) or major cardiovascular events (7.1 % versus 10.4 % respectively, p = 0.27). Mortality at 30 days was 3.9 % in the bivalirudin group and 5.4 % in the heparin group (p = 0.56).

Conclusion

This register of primary angioplasty by radial access, bivalirudin did not demonstrate a significant reduction in major bleeding or major cardiovascular events compared with heparin plus glycoprotein provisionally.

Editorial comment

The lack of randomization and the relatively few patients receiving bivalirudin (only 159 of 1009) are significant limitations of the study. Overall, bleeding complications were uncommon, which can be explained by 100% of radial access. Only provisional use of glycoprotein in the heparin group (55 %) may also have contributed and is well below the use thereof in randomized studies. About half of the bleeding is not related to the access, so that bivalirudin still has a large population to benefit even using radial access. However, the use must be more selective given the risk of bleeding in each patient.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....