Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention show similar outcomes for ostial/midshaft lesion in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Original title: Long-Term Clinical Outcome Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Ostial/Midshaft Lesion in Unprotected Left main Coronary Artery From The DELTA Registry. Reference: Toru Nagamuna et al. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention. Article in Press

Even though surgery remains the “gold standard” to treat UMCLA lesions, current guidelines have incorporated PCI as class IIa at ostium/midshaft level. The advantage of these segments is that they allow larger stent implantation without bifurcation compromise.

This registry analyzed 856 patients, 482 (56.3%) underwent left main PCI with first generation DES implantation and 374 (43.7%) revascularization surgery. Primary end point was a composite of all cause death, infarction and stroke and secondary end point added target vessel and target lesion revascularization.

The PCI group included younger, less hypertensive patients and fewer diabetics, but included more patients with renal failure and infarction episodes. PCI group showed lower SYNTAX scores and fewer multiple vessel and right coronary artery disease. Follow up at 1293 (989-1703) showed a 0.6% incidence of definite or probable thrombosis. 

The propensity score adjusted analysis showed no significant differences between the groups both at primary (HR 1.21, IC 95% 0.79 a 1.86; p=0.372) and secondary end points. There was a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization in the PCI group (HR 1.94, IC 95% 1.03 a 3.64; p=0.039). Age variable and Euroscore were both event predictors.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that PCI for ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA is associated with clinical outcomes comparable to those observed with CABG, despite the use of first-generation DES

Comment

This study shows that PCI for ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA outcomes are comparable to those of surgery. This had already been showed in the MAIN COMPARE study. Although there were no significant differences at end points, PCI had higher angiography and revascularization rates. This could be due to the use of first generation DES and infrequent use of IVUS (33.4%).  However, PCI for ostial/midshaft lesions in ULMCA with DES implantation has been proved a viable strategy.

Courtesy of  Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation
Buenos Aires – Argentina

Dr. Carlos Fava

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...