3 to 6 months of dual antiplatelet after DES reduced bleeding and did not raise mortality or infarction.

Original title: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing short term -vs- long term dual antiplatelet therapy following drug eluting stents. Reference: El-Hayek G et al. Am J Cardiol. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

This meta-analysis examined the data of four randomized and controlled studies (EXCELLENT, PRODIGY, RESET y OPTIMIZE) including 8157 patients receiving sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus or zotarolimus DES. Patients were randomized to prolonged antiplatelet therapy (12 to 24 months; n=4076) or double antiagregation for a short period of time (3 to 6 months; n=4081). In all 4 studies, antiagregation was aspirin plus clopidogrel.

At 12 months, MI and cardiac death rates (primary end point) happened in 136 patients (3.3%) in the group of 3 to 6 months antiagregation therapy and in 123 patients (3%) in the 12 to 24 group (OR 1.11, IC 95% 0.87 to 1.43; p=0.41).

Patients receiving the short scheme had a 59% lower risk of major bleeding but with a similar ischemic event rate (OR 0.41, IC 95% 0.21 to 0.81; p=0.01).

Stent thrombosis was more frequent in the short scheme group, yet with no significant statistical importance. (OR 1.29, IC 95% 0.76 to 2.21; p=0.35).

Conclusion

Prolonged therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after DES significantly increases bleeding risk and does not modify el composite of cardiac death and MI compared to a double antiagregation short scheme. 

Editorial Comment

New generations DES have brought light to the requirement of double antiagregation schemes, increasingly perceived as no longer needed, since outcomes depend more on the choice of DES than on prolonged antiagregation therapies.  

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....