3 to 6 months of dual antiplatelet after DES reduced bleeding and did not raise mortality or infarction.

Original title: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing short term -vs- long term dual antiplatelet therapy following drug eluting stents. Reference: El-Hayek G et al. Am J Cardiol. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

This meta-analysis examined the data of four randomized and controlled studies (EXCELLENT, PRODIGY, RESET y OPTIMIZE) including 8157 patients receiving sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus or zotarolimus DES. Patients were randomized to prolonged antiplatelet therapy (12 to 24 months; n=4076) or double antiagregation for a short period of time (3 to 6 months; n=4081). In all 4 studies, antiagregation was aspirin plus clopidogrel.

At 12 months, MI and cardiac death rates (primary end point) happened in 136 patients (3.3%) in the group of 3 to 6 months antiagregation therapy and in 123 patients (3%) in the 12 to 24 group (OR 1.11, IC 95% 0.87 to 1.43; p=0.41).

Patients receiving the short scheme had a 59% lower risk of major bleeding but with a similar ischemic event rate (OR 0.41, IC 95% 0.21 to 0.81; p=0.01).

Stent thrombosis was more frequent in the short scheme group, yet with no significant statistical importance. (OR 1.29, IC 95% 0.76 to 2.21; p=0.35).

Conclusion

Prolonged therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after DES significantly increases bleeding risk and does not modify el composite of cardiac death and MI compared to a double antiagregation short scheme. 

Editorial Comment

New generations DES have brought light to the requirement of double antiagregation schemes, increasingly perceived as no longer needed, since outcomes depend more on the choice of DES than on prolonged antiagregation therapies.  

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...