Thienopyridine Pretreatment in Non ST Elevation ACS syndrome

Original title: Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reference: Bellemain-Appaix A. et al. BMJ. 2014;Epub ahead of print.

This meta-analysis included 7 studies that included a total 32383 patients admitted with non ST elevation ACS; 17545 (54.5%) underwent PCI. These studies were published between 2001 and 2013: 3 were randomized, 1 was a sub study of a randomized study and 3 were observational studies.

Thienopyridine pretreatment varied in the different studies. For most patients it consisted of a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose, one used a 600 mg and another was left to operator’s criteria. In the ACCOAST study, patients randomized to pretreatment received 30mg of prasugrel at admission and when PCI was required, the loading dose was completed with 30 additional mg. 

Pretreatment was no associated with a lower risk of all cause or cardiovascular death in the whole cohort or in PCI patients, though a significant increase of bleeding was observed.

When looking at randomized studies alone, efficacy was similar but bleeding was similar. In the complete cohort, pretreatment did reduce the secondary end point, a combination of MACE (OR 0.84; IC 95% 0.72 to 0.98); however, when considering only AMI, the difference was not significant (OR 0.81; IC 95% 0.64 to 1.03). Stroke and urgent revascularization were similar despite pretreatment.

In the PCI cohort, pretreatment only reduced urgent revascularization and this benefit was seen in the subgroup of patients from CURE that underwent PCI.

Conclusion

Thyenopiridine pretreatment in non-ST elevation ACS patients does not reduce mortality and causes excess bleeding.

Editorial Comment

The concept of systematic and immediate pretreatment with a P2Y12 receptor antagonist in non-ST elevation ACS patients needs further consideration, especially in the light of the fact that the sub study of CURE PCI patients was carried out more than 10 years ago and that it was not designed to evaluate pretreatment efficacy. In addition, new, more effective P2Y12 receptor inhibitors have come out in recent years. 

SOLACI

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...