Frequency, indication and evolution of emergency cardiac surgery during TAVI

Original Title: Emergent cardiac surgery during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): insight the Edwards SAPIENS Aortic Bioprosthesis Outcome (SOURCE) registry. Reference: Holger Eggerbrecht, et al. EuroIntervention 2014;10:975-81

SOURCE register data from patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapiens valve, were analyzed; out of 2307 patients, 27 (1.2%) required emergency cardiac surgery (ECS).

Valve stenosis was equally severe, but the aortic annulus diameter was larger in those that required ECS; this difference increased when using a

ECS causes were embolism/migration in 9 patients, aortic injury (dissection and perforation) in 7, aortic annulus rupture in 3, severe aortic regurgitation in 3, myocardial tamponade in 2, transapical bleeding in 1, heart block in 1 and suboptimal valve deployment in 1. 10 ECS patients died within 72 hours (VARC-2). At 30 days, mortality was 51.9% vs. 7.8% of those that did not require ECS (p<0.001). At 90 days, mortality was even higher, reaching 70% (19/27).

Conclusion

ECS rates in the context of TAVI is very low (1.2%), it should be performed with no delay and is associated with a 52% mortality rate at 30 days. Severe complications with acute evolution (annulus rupture or aortic injury) presented even higher mortality rates.

Commentary

This study, as well as others, has shown that although ECS during TAVI is not a frequent procedure, it unfortunately has high mortality rates within 90 days. This depends on the type of complications it may cause, and calls for a technological effort to develop more flexible and better adjusted valves to avoid these complications. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation – Buenos Aires

Carlos Fava

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...