Polymer-Free Biolimus Coated Stent: 5 Year Outcomes

Original Title: Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions4- and 12-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Final 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective, Multicenter BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial CME. Reference: Ricardo A. Costa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(1):51-64.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and long term outcomes of the new polymer free biolimus coated stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions.

The BioFreedom stent incorporates a low profile stainless steel scaffold with a surface that has been modified to create a selective abluminal micro structure that allows the adhesion and further release of Biolimus A9 (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland).

A total of 182 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to the new polymer free stent with a standard dose of the drug vs. the same stent with a low dose vs. the first generation paclitaxel eluting stent, in 4 cities, in Germany.

Baseline and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the 3 groups.

At 4 month angiographic follow up, there was significantly lower lumen loss with the standard and lower doses biolimus releasing stents vs. the paclitaxel eluting stent (0.08 y 0.12 mm vs. 0.37 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001 for the biolimus eluting stent with standard dose vs. paclitaxel eluting stent, and p=0.002 for the biolimus eluting stent with low dose vs. paclitaxel eluting stent).

At 12 months, late lumen loss (primary end point) was 0.17 mm for the biolimus eluting with standard dose vs. 0.35 mm for the paclitaxel ES, reaching both non inferiority (p=0.001) and superiority (p=0.11). The low dose biolimus eluting stent did not reach non inferiority compared to the paclitaxel eluting stent.

At 5 years, there were no significant differences in major cardiac events between the three groups (23.8%, 26.4% and 20.3%) or the ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (10.8%, 13.4% and 10.2%). There were no reports of definite / probable thrombosis in the study.

Conclusion
The polymer free biolimus eluting stent with standard dose showed non inferiority compared to the first generation paclitaxel eluting stent in terms of late lumen loss at 12 months but not for the low dose biolimus eluting stent. At 5 years clinical events were similar and in low numbers, with no definite/ probable thrombosis events.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...