Polymer-Free Biolimus Coated Stent: 5 Year Outcomes

Original Title: Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions4- and 12-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Final 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective, Multicenter BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial CME. Reference: Ricardo A. Costa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(1):51-64.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and long term outcomes of the new polymer free biolimus coated stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions.

The BioFreedom stent incorporates a low profile stainless steel scaffold with a surface that has been modified to create a selective abluminal micro structure that allows the adhesion and further release of Biolimus A9 (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland).

A total of 182 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to the new polymer free stent with a standard dose of the drug vs. the same stent with a low dose vs. the first generation paclitaxel eluting stent, in 4 cities, in Germany.

Baseline and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the 3 groups.

At 4 month angiographic follow up, there was significantly lower lumen loss with the standard and lower doses biolimus releasing stents vs. the paclitaxel eluting stent (0.08 y 0.12 mm vs. 0.37 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001 for the biolimus eluting stent with standard dose vs. paclitaxel eluting stent, and p=0.002 for the biolimus eluting stent with low dose vs. paclitaxel eluting stent).

At 12 months, late lumen loss (primary end point) was 0.17 mm for the biolimus eluting with standard dose vs. 0.35 mm for the paclitaxel ES, reaching both non inferiority (p=0.001) and superiority (p=0.11). The low dose biolimus eluting stent did not reach non inferiority compared to the paclitaxel eluting stent.

At 5 years, there were no significant differences in major cardiac events between the three groups (23.8%, 26.4% and 20.3%) or the ischemia driven target lesion revascularization (10.8%, 13.4% and 10.2%). There were no reports of definite / probable thrombosis in the study.

Conclusion
The polymer free biolimus eluting stent with standard dose showed non inferiority compared to the first generation paclitaxel eluting stent in terms of late lumen loss at 12 months but not for the low dose biolimus eluting stent. At 5 years clinical events were similar and in low numbers, with no definite/ probable thrombosis events.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....