Beta-Blockers for Revascularized Patients: To Prescribe or Not?

Beta-Blockers for Revascularized Patients

This study examines predictors and outcomes associated with the prescription of beta-blockers at discharge after a successful coronary angioplasty in patients with stable chronic angina WITHOUT prior history of acute myocardial infarction or heart failure.

 

The benefit of beta-blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction or systolic heart failure is well documented. However, their benefits in patients with stable chronic angina, particularly those who have undergone an angioplasty, remain unclear.

 

This study included patients with stable chronic angina without prior history of myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%), or systolic heart failure who underwent an elective angioplasty between January 2005 and March 2013.

 

These patients were retrospectively analyzed regarding beta-blocker prescription at discharge.

 

All-cause mortality was analyzed (primary endpoint), as well as the following:

  • Revascularization.
  • Hospitalization due to acute myocardial infarction.
  • Heart failure or stroke at 30 days.
  • Heart failure or stroke at 3 years in patients ≥65 years old.

 

A total of 755,215 patients were enrolled; 71.4% were discharged on beta-blockers.

 

At 3 years, no differences were observed in patients who had been prescribed beta-blockers, as regards the following:

  • Adjusted mortality rate (14.0% vs. 13.3%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96 to 1.03; p = 0.84).
  • Myocardial infarction (4.2% vs. 3.9%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07; p = 0.92).
  • Stroke (2.3% vs. 2.0%; HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.18; p = 0.14).
  • Revascularization (18.2% vs. 17.8%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.01; p = 0.10).

 

However, a higher rate of hospital readmissions due to heart failure was indeed observed in patients discharged on a treatment with beta-blockers (8.0% vs. 6.1%; HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.25; p < 0.001).

 

During the period between 2005 and 2013, there was a gradual increase in the prescription of beta-blockers in this cohort.

 

Conclusion

The prescription of beta-blockers at discharge after an elective angioplasty in patients ≥65 years old with stable chronic angina and without prior history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ejection fraction <40% was not associated with any reduction in events at 30 days or 3 years. However, the prescription of beta-blockers in this population continued to increase over time.

 

Original title: Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Insights From the NCDR Registry.

Reference: Apurva A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(16):1639-1648.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

 

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...