Beta-Blockers for Revascularized Patients: To Prescribe or Not?

Beta-Blockers for Revascularized Patients

This study examines predictors and outcomes associated with the prescription of beta-blockers at discharge after a successful coronary angioplasty in patients with stable chronic angina WITHOUT prior history of acute myocardial infarction or heart failure.

 

The benefit of beta-blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction or systolic heart failure is well documented. However, their benefits in patients with stable chronic angina, particularly those who have undergone an angioplasty, remain unclear.

 

This study included patients with stable chronic angina without prior history of myocardial infarction, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%), or systolic heart failure who underwent an elective angioplasty between January 2005 and March 2013.

 

These patients were retrospectively analyzed regarding beta-blocker prescription at discharge.

 

All-cause mortality was analyzed (primary endpoint), as well as the following:

  • Revascularization.
  • Hospitalization due to acute myocardial infarction.
  • Heart failure or stroke at 30 days.
  • Heart failure or stroke at 3 years in patients ≥65 years old.

 

A total of 755,215 patients were enrolled; 71.4% were discharged on beta-blockers.

 

At 3 years, no differences were observed in patients who had been prescribed beta-blockers, as regards the following:

  • Adjusted mortality rate (14.0% vs. 13.3%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96 to 1.03; p = 0.84).
  • Myocardial infarction (4.2% vs. 3.9%; HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07; p = 0.92).
  • Stroke (2.3% vs. 2.0%; HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.18; p = 0.14).
  • Revascularization (18.2% vs. 17.8%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.01; p = 0.10).

 

However, a higher rate of hospital readmissions due to heart failure was indeed observed in patients discharged on a treatment with beta-blockers (8.0% vs. 6.1%; HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.25; p < 0.001).

 

During the period between 2005 and 2013, there was a gradual increase in the prescription of beta-blockers in this cohort.

 

Conclusion

The prescription of beta-blockers at discharge after an elective angioplasty in patients ≥65 years old with stable chronic angina and without prior history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, or ejection fraction <40% was not associated with any reduction in events at 30 days or 3 years. However, the prescription of beta-blockers in this population continued to increase over time.

 

Original title: Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Insights From the NCDR Registry.

Reference: Apurva A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(16):1639-1648.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

 

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Is upper-limb aerobic training an effective alternative to lower-limb exercise in peripheral artery disease?

Peripheral artery disease is associated with impaired functional capacity, reduced walking distance, and poorer quality of life, and structured exercise is a class I...