Intracoronary Abciximab reduces events in diabetics during PPCI

abciximabDiabetic patients have an increased risk of future cardiovascular events after an ST elevation MI. Administration of an intracoronary abciximab bolus during primary PCI could be beneficial for this high risk subgroup of patients.

 

This study reports one year clinical outcomes and CMR imaging of patients randomized to intracoronary vs. intravenous abciximab during primary PCI. Primary end point was a composite of death or re-infarction.

 

Of 2,470 patients included in this study, 473 (19%) had diabetes and 1,997 (81%) did not.

 

At one year, primary end point was significantly reduced in diabetic patients receiving intracoronary abciximab compared to those receiving an intravenous bolus (9.2% vs. 17.6%; HR: 0.49; CI 95%: 0.28 to 0.83; p=0.009).

 

The intracoronary abciximab bolus did not reduce events in non-diabetics (7.4% vs. 7.5%; HR: 0.95; CI 95%: 0.68 to 1.33; p=0.77).

 

In diabetic patients, intracoronary abciximab reduced the risk of death (5.8% vs. 11.2%; HR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.26 to 0.98; p=0.043) and definite/probable thrombosis (1.3% vs. 4.8%; HR: 0.27; CI 95%: 0.08 to 0.98; p=0.046) compared to intravenous abciximab.

 

The savaged myocardium index by CMR saw a significant increase only in diabetic patients randomized to intracoronary abciximab.

 

Conclusion

Intracoronary abciximab bolus administration reduces events in diabetic STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

 

Original Title: 1-Year Outcomes with Intracoronary Abciximab in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Raffaele Piccolo et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(7):727-738.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....