Intracoronary Abciximab reduces events in diabetics during PPCI

abciximabDiabetic patients have an increased risk of future cardiovascular events after an ST elevation MI. Administration of an intracoronary abciximab bolus during primary PCI could be beneficial for this high risk subgroup of patients.

 

This study reports one year clinical outcomes and CMR imaging of patients randomized to intracoronary vs. intravenous abciximab during primary PCI. Primary end point was a composite of death or re-infarction.

 

Of 2,470 patients included in this study, 473 (19%) had diabetes and 1,997 (81%) did not.

 

At one year, primary end point was significantly reduced in diabetic patients receiving intracoronary abciximab compared to those receiving an intravenous bolus (9.2% vs. 17.6%; HR: 0.49; CI 95%: 0.28 to 0.83; p=0.009).

 

The intracoronary abciximab bolus did not reduce events in non-diabetics (7.4% vs. 7.5%; HR: 0.95; CI 95%: 0.68 to 1.33; p=0.77).

 

In diabetic patients, intracoronary abciximab reduced the risk of death (5.8% vs. 11.2%; HR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.26 to 0.98; p=0.043) and definite/probable thrombosis (1.3% vs. 4.8%; HR: 0.27; CI 95%: 0.08 to 0.98; p=0.046) compared to intravenous abciximab.

 

The savaged myocardium index by CMR saw a significant increase only in diabetic patients randomized to intracoronary abciximab.

 

Conclusion

Intracoronary abciximab bolus administration reduces events in diabetic STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

 

Original Title: 1-Year Outcomes with Intracoronary Abciximab in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Raffaele Piccolo et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(7):727-738.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...