Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Carotid PCI: Safe and Effective?

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Carotid PCIRemote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute or chronic cerebral ischemia. However, is remains unclear whether RIPC could prevent an ischemic event in the context of carotid PCI in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.

 

The study included patients with severe carotid artery stenosis randomized to RIPC, vs. two control groups, a sham RIPC group and a non- intervention group.

 

Patients in the RIPC arm received the procedure twice a day two weeks prior carotid artery stenting (CAS), as well as patients in the sham RIPC control group.

 

NSE and S-100B plasma levels were measured to assess RIPC safety; C reactive protein levels and new ischemic lesions were measure with MRI to assess efficacy.

 

Primary end point was the presence of new lesions measured by diffusion weight imaging within 48 hours after CAS, and clinical events within 6 months.

 

189 were randomized in all, (63 in each arm). Both RIPC and sham RIPC were well tolerated and completed with high compliance (98.41% and 95.24% respectively). There were no significant changes of NSE or S-100B, or adverse events.

 

The incidence of new diffusion weight imaging lesions was significantly lower than in the RIPC group (15.87%) compared to the sham RIPC group (36.51%, p<0.01) or the control group (41.27%, p<0.01). Lesion volume also resulted significantly lower (p<0.01).

 

As regards post CAS clinical events, there were 1 transient ischemic attack in the RIPC group, 2 strokes in the control group, and 2 strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack in the sham RIPC group, with no statistical importance.

 

Conclusion

RIPC is safe before CAS and it could also reduce periprocedural events risk. However, RIPC mechanisms and effects on clinical events still call for further research.

 

Original Title: Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Patients with Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis Prior to Carotid Artery Stenting: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Wenbo Zhao et al. Circulation. 2017 Feb 7. [Epub ahead of print].


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....