EVOLVE II: Diabetes Substudy: Results at 3 Years after the SYNERGY Stent in Diabetics

Courtesy of SBHCI

EVOLVE II: Diabetes Substudy: Results at 3 Years after the SYNERGY Stent in DiabeticsDiabetic patients have worse evolution after coronary PCI. Drug eluting stents with bioresorbable polymers were designed to facilitate arterial healing, and reduce inflammation and late and very late thrombosis risk.

 

This sub-study of diabetic EVOLVE II patients presents the 3 year outcomes of the SYNERGY stent.

 

The EVOLVE II included 1684 patients with ≤3 lesions in one or two native arteries with a lesion length of ≤34 mm and a reference diameter of ≥2.25 mm and ≤ 4.0 (the study excluded left main, CTO, vein grafts, instent restenosis and ST elevation MI).

 

Of the total number of patients, 846 received the SYNERGY stent, and 838 the PROMUS Element Plus stent.

Primary end point (cardiovascular death, vessel related MI, and target vessel revascularization) saw a 12.2% incidence in diabetic patients, which is comparable to the 10.8% of the general population, despite 30% of diabetic patients were insulin-dependent.

 

It is worth mentioning that 44% of diabetic patients were still on antiaggregants at 3 year follow up.

 

Conclusion

The 3 year outcomes reinforce the evidence in favor of the use of the SYNERGY stent in diabetic patients.

 

Courtesy of la SBHCI

 

Dra. Martine Gilard
Dra. Martine Gilard

Original Title: Outcomes after PCI with a bioresorbable polymer- coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent in patients with diabetes: three-year results from the EVOLVE II Diabetes Substudy.

Presenter: Martine Gilard.

 

 

GilardMartine


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....