Are 7 Fr Dedicated Transradial Introducers Safe?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Are 7 Fr Dedicated Transradial Introducers Safe?The transradial approach has been proven beneficial for quite some time now, but certain scenarios require the use of a 7 Fr or 8 Fr introducer, which is a great limitation.

 

This study included 60 patients who underwent complex angioplasty with the help of 7 Fr dedicated transradial (TR) introducer Glidesheath Slender (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan).

 

This new introducer combines an inner diameter compatible with any 7 Fr (2.46 mm) guiding catheter and an outer diameter smaller than current 7 Fr (2.79 mm) sheaths.

 

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions, complex bifurcation lesions, chronic total occlusions (CTO), and cases of rotational atherectomy and severe vascular tortuosity were all defined as complex lesions.

 

The primary endpoint was procedural success, understood as completing the scheduled angioplasty, and the secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major bleeding, vascular access complications, spasms, and radial artery occlusion.

 

Mean patient age was 66 years old (most subjects were male). Right transradial access was used in 56 patients, and bilateral access was used in 4 patients. Additionally, 13 patients had already received prior transradial access.

 

Treated lesions were distributed as follows: unprotected LMCA (20 patients), complex bifurcation lesions (16 patients), chronic total occlusions (15 patients), and rotational atherectomy (10 patients).

 

The primary endpoint was reached in 97% of all cases. One patient with right coronary CTO could not be rechanneled and another patient presented severe subclavian tortuosity, requiring conversion to a transfemoral approach.

 

On the other hand, the secondary endpoint was present in 10 patients: 3 of them presented access-site complications (two type II local hematoma and one uncomplicated radial artery dissection), and another 7 presented spasms.

 

Doppler ultrasound imaging at 30 days was carried out in 62 of 64 patients with radial access, with three cases of radial artery occlusion (4.8%).

 

Conclusion

Use of the 7 Fr Glidesheath Slender dedicated introducer for complex coronary interventions proved to be feasible. As a matter of fact, this study showed a high rate of procedural success and a low rate of vascular complications. These favorable results need to be confirmed in larger multicenter studies.

 

Editorial Comment

As we all know, the transradial approach has proven to be highly beneficial. In this case, technological advances allow us to move towards increasingly complex scenarios, while maintaining procedural safety and efficacy, with low rates of radial artery occlusion (particularly for CTO, for which the transfemoral approach is preferred).

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original Title: First Prospective multicenter Experience With the 7 French Glidesheat Slender for Complex Transradial Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Adel Aminian, et al Catherization Cardiovascular Intervention 2017;89:1014-1020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ESC 2025 | BETAMI-DANBLOCK: Randomized Discontinuation of Beta-Blockers after MI

The routine use of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been a historical recommendation based on studies prior to the era of percutaneous...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2023 | SELECT Trial: Semaglutide in Patients Without Diabetes

Given the obesity pandemic projected for the year 2035, it is imperative to address this disease as a priority, through well-known hygienic-dietary measures and...

ACC 2023 | COORDINATE-DIABETES

Approximately only 2.7% of all diabetic patients with ischemic heart disease in the United States receive optimal treatment consisting in high doses of statins...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...