Post EVAR Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Based Follow Up Reduces CT by 90%. Is It Safe Though?

This four-year retrospective analyzis has shown that contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post endovascular aortic repair is safe and effective. Aneurysm related mortality, reintervention rate, sac retraction and endoleak detection resulted similar to that of CT based follow up protocols.

El tratamiento endovascular parece superior a la cirugía en aneurismas rotosIn this study, doppler and enhanced contrast ultrasound were the main follow up techniques, leaving CT for undiagnosed cases, ambiguous images, or for planned reintervention cases. This protocol, used the last 4 years, reduced CT by 90%, thereby reducing radiation exposure.

 

This reference center based its follow up plan on doppler ultrasound, leaving CT scans for undiagnosed cases in the period between 1999 and 2011 (group A). Since 2012, contrast ultrasound was introduced for cases where conventional doppler ultrasound would detect endoleak, > 5mm sac growth within 6 months, or routinely for patients with kidney failure or contrast allergies.


Read also: Risk of Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.


The study included a total 880 patients (mean age: 75.6± 8.4 years; 824 male) undergoing EVAR between 1999 and 2015 with at least one year follow up (mean 48 months).

 

During this period, 318 contrast enhanced ultrasound were performed with no associated complications.

 

Indication for contrast enhanced ultrasound were endoleak (50% of cases), sac expansion (11%), kidney failure level 3 or higher (29%) and iodine contrast allergies (10%).


Read also: Maintaining Physical Activity After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Mortality.


Contrast enhanced ultrasound was compared against CT and additional confirmation by angiography or operative findings in the first 100 patients.

 

Contrast enhanced ultrasound showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when classifying endoleaks.

 

There were no differences in events between the different groups of patients and CT use was reduced by 90%.

 

Conclusion

The introduction of contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post EVAR resulted as safe and effective for endoleak detection as the CT based protocols published so far. This allowed a 90% reduction in CT use, with the resulting reduction in iodine radiation exposure.  

 

Original title: Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective.

Reference: Emiliano Chisci et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2018). Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...