Post EVAR Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Based Follow Up Reduces CT by 90%. Is It Safe Though?

This four-year retrospective analyzis has shown that contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post endovascular aortic repair is safe and effective. Aneurysm related mortality, reintervention rate, sac retraction and endoleak detection resulted similar to that of CT based follow up protocols.

El tratamiento endovascular parece superior a la cirugía en aneurismas rotosIn this study, doppler and enhanced contrast ultrasound were the main follow up techniques, leaving CT for undiagnosed cases, ambiguous images, or for planned reintervention cases. This protocol, used the last 4 years, reduced CT by 90%, thereby reducing radiation exposure.

 

This reference center based its follow up plan on doppler ultrasound, leaving CT scans for undiagnosed cases in the period between 1999 and 2011 (group A). Since 2012, contrast ultrasound was introduced for cases where conventional doppler ultrasound would detect endoleak, > 5mm sac growth within 6 months, or routinely for patients with kidney failure or contrast allergies.


Read also: Risk of Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.


The study included a total 880 patients (mean age: 75.6± 8.4 years; 824 male) undergoing EVAR between 1999 and 2015 with at least one year follow up (mean 48 months).

 

During this period, 318 contrast enhanced ultrasound were performed with no associated complications.

 

Indication for contrast enhanced ultrasound were endoleak (50% of cases), sac expansion (11%), kidney failure level 3 or higher (29%) and iodine contrast allergies (10%).


Read also: Maintaining Physical Activity After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Mortality.


Contrast enhanced ultrasound was compared against CT and additional confirmation by angiography or operative findings in the first 100 patients.

 

Contrast enhanced ultrasound showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when classifying endoleaks.

 

There were no differences in events between the different groups of patients and CT use was reduced by 90%.

 

Conclusion

The introduction of contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post EVAR resulted as safe and effective for endoleak detection as the CT based protocols published so far. This allowed a 90% reduction in CT use, with the resulting reduction in iodine radiation exposure.  

 

Original title: Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective.

Reference: Emiliano Chisci et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2018). Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | HI-PEITHO: Catheter-directed strategy (EKOS) in intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism

The treatment of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be an area of therapeutic uncertainty. The initial PEITHO study (2014) demonstrated a reduction in...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...