Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty at Very Long Term

With a mean follow up of 15 years, and some patients that survived over 20 years, this study shows that more than 75% of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis show sustained results with balloon valvuloplasty. Predictors of this excellent long-term outcome are many, but they are determined mainly by age, prior symptoms and valve area obtained after procedure.  

valvuloplastía mitralOver the years, mitral valvuloplasty has remained the preferred treatment for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and suitable anatomy.

 

All consecutive patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty between 1987 and 2010 were included. Primary end-point was a composite of all cause death, need for mitral surgery or repeat valvuloplasty at up to 23 years.


Read also: How to Predict Events in Order to Decide Whether to Revascularize Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.


In all, 1582 patients were included over the years and success was achieved in 90.9% of the population. I independent predictors of intraprocedural success were left atrial size (OR 0.96, p=0.045), Wilkins score ≤8 (OR 1.66, p=0.045), and age (OR 0.97, p=0.006).

Very long-term follow-up (mean follow up = 15.6 years) was obtained in 79.1% of the population, with 19.1% incidence of the primary end-point. Separately, mortality resulted as low as 0.6%, need for valve surgery, 8.3%, and repeat valvuloplasty, 10%.


Read also: More Evidence For MitraClip in High Risk Patients with Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.


On multivariable analysis, functional class III-IV (HR 1.62, p<0.001), older age (HR 0.97, p=0.028 and post procedural mitral area ≤1.75 cm² (HR 1.67; p=0.028) were independent predictors of the primary end point.

 

Conclusion

Time goes by and mitral valvuloplasty remains the preferred treatment for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and suitable anatomy, given its excellent results even after 20 years.

 

Original Title: Very Long Term Follow-Up After Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty.

Reference: Rafael A. Meneguz-Moreno et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...