ESC 2019 | New European Guidelines on “Chronic Coronary Syndromes”

In Paris, during the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2019 Scientific Sessions, new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary syndromes were presented. This document, simultaneously published in Euro Heart J, updates the 2013 guidelines on stable ischemic heart disease and takes out the word “stable” so as to emphasize that the disease is anything but that.

Mann mit Herzinfarkt drückt seine Hände an die Brust

Ischemic heart disease can have long stable periods, but it can become unstable at any time. This is typically due to plaque rupture or erosion.

This terminological change was in part to remind us that this disease requires different approaches depending on the time. There are more stable phases and less stable phases, but, in most cases, the disease advances. The point is to intervene on the disease to prevent such advancement and, consequently, events.

These guidelines focus on the most common scenarios: patients with angina and suspected coronary artery disease; asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with stabilized symptoms less than one year after an initial diagnosis or revascularization; patients with angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease; asymptomatic patients in whom coronary artery disease is detected at a preventive checkup, and patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease.


Read also: ESC 2019 | COMPLETE: Definitive Evidence for Infarction with Multivessel Disease.


One of the key aspects of the new guidelines that they acknowledge that the pretest probability of disease in patients presenting with chest pain is dramatically reduced compared to 2013 numbers.

Invasive tests are recommended in patients at high probability of coronary artery disease, while functional tests are recommended in patients at moderate probability. For the growing proportion of patients in whom coronary artery disease seems unlikely, computerized tomography (CT) is recommended.

Another new recommendation in the 2019 guidelines is the addition of a second antithrombotic drug to aspirin, particularly for primary prevention in patients at high risk of ischemic events and low risk for bleeding.

In patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation or another indication for anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants are now recommended over vitamin-K antagonists.


Read also: ESC 2019 | ISAR-REACT 5 | Which Is Better in ACS, Prasugrel or Ticagrelor?


As regards revascularization, more evidence has arisen on the usefulness of invasive functional assessments (FFR or iFR), where angioplasty can improve symptoms and also reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction.

Lastly, following the trend of all other recently published documents, writers emphasized the importance of lifestyle modifications, pollution exposure, and other primary prevention measures that were mentioned briefly in the 2013 version.

Guias-sindromes-coronarios-cronicos-articulo-original

Original title: 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The task force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology.

Reference: Knuuti J et al. Euro Heart J. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...