Tricuspid valve: Is Percutaneous Intervention Feasible in Patients with Definite Pacemaker?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

As we know, with higher life expectancy comes a significant increase in the use of definite pacemakers, defibrillators and resynchronization devices. Along these lines, the presence of catheters is associated to tricuspid regurgitation, which over time might become severe, leading to cardiac regurgitation and potentially heart failure. 

¿Fin de la discusión sobre el impacto del marcapaso post TAVI?

This group is now being treated with transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), but little is known about its efficacy.

The study looked at 470 tricuspid regurgitation patients form the TriValve registry undergoing TTVI between January 2015 and December 2018. 121 (25.7%) of these patients presented pacemakers or defibrillators (Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device – CIED) and its evolution was compared against 349 patients with no CIED.

The groups were similar, mean age was 76, they were mostly women, with 36% atrial fibrillation, and EuroScore 10. Patients receiving CIED presented a higher number of hospitalizations, more functional class III-IV, ascites, peripheral edema, COPD, need for diuretics and higher NT pro-BNP. The most frequent cause was functional.


Read also: Plaque Morphology Could Modify Functional Measurements.


In addition, CIED patients presented lower ejection fraction, larger left ventricular diameter and area and higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure. However, effective regurgitant orifice area was smaller. 

In both groups, the device most used was the MitraClip, with 80% procedural success.

In-hospital mortality was 2.9% for the no-CIED and 3.7% for the CIED (p=0.7). 


Read also: The Most Read Scientific Articles of March.


At 30 days, there were no significant differences neither in residual tricuspid regurgitation ≤2+ (70.8 vs. 73.7%) nor in improvement to functional class I-II (66% vs. 65% p=0.3).

Survival at one year was similar (80.7% vs. 73.6% p=0.3).

Conclusion

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention in patients with definite pacemaker or defibrillators is feasible and has good hospital outcomes which in the short term are comparable to those of patients with no pacemakers or defibrillators. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Original Title: Outcomes of TTVI in Patients With Pacemaker or Defibrillator Leads Data From the TriValve Registry.

Reference: Maurizio Taramasso, et al. J Am coll Cardiol Intv 2020;13:554-64.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...