Differences in Plaque Progression Depending on its Characteristics

The pattern of growth for each plaque differs according to the presence of certain risk factors. Atheroma volume at baseline was the most important predictor of plaque developing into obstructive lesions, as opposed to other characteristics historically considered as “dangerous.”

iFR en lesiones no culpables: el momento de la medición parece cambiar la historia

The aim of this study was to analyze whether the pattern of non-obstructive lesion progression could differ according to certain characteristics.

It is still debatable whether such characteristics simply represent a different phase during the natural history of the disease or if they can anticipate disease progression.

This prospective, multinational registry enrolled consecutive patients with non-obstructive coronary artery lesions (<50%), who underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography at intervals at least 2 years.

High-risk plaque was defined as lesions with 2 or more of the following features: positive remodeling, calcified nodules, and hypoattenuation. Baseline quantitative angiographic percent obstruction and atheroma volume were compared over time between high-risk and non-high-risk plaque.


Read also: Subintimal Re-Entry in CTO Improves Outcomes.


A total of 3049 non-obstructive lesions were identified in 1297 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 9.3 years); 425 lesions met the high-risk criteria and 2624 did not.

Upon adjusted multivariate analysis, only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could independently predict plaque progression (p < 0.05 for both). High-risk characteristics were not associated with progression over time.

Conclusion

Each non-obstructive plaque has its own individual morphologic pattern, and only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could predict their progression over time. High-risk characteristics could not predict progression, even when considered as a composite.

Original title: Differences in Progression to Obstructive Lesions per High-Risk Plaque Features and Plaque Volumes With CCTA.

Reference: Sang-Eun Lee et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;13(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.011.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....