Differences in Plaque Progression Depending on its Characteristics

The pattern of growth for each plaque differs according to the presence of certain risk factors. Atheroma volume at baseline was the most important predictor of plaque developing into obstructive lesions, as opposed to other characteristics historically considered as “dangerous.”

iFR en lesiones no culpables: el momento de la medición parece cambiar la historia

The aim of this study was to analyze whether the pattern of non-obstructive lesion progression could differ according to certain characteristics.

It is still debatable whether such characteristics simply represent a different phase during the natural history of the disease or if they can anticipate disease progression.

This prospective, multinational registry enrolled consecutive patients with non-obstructive coronary artery lesions (<50%), who underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography at intervals at least 2 years.

High-risk plaque was defined as lesions with 2 or more of the following features: positive remodeling, calcified nodules, and hypoattenuation. Baseline quantitative angiographic percent obstruction and atheroma volume were compared over time between high-risk and non-high-risk plaque.


Read also: Subintimal Re-Entry in CTO Improves Outcomes.


A total of 3049 non-obstructive lesions were identified in 1297 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 9.3 years); 425 lesions met the high-risk criteria and 2624 did not.

Upon adjusted multivariate analysis, only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could independently predict plaque progression (p < 0.05 for both). High-risk characteristics were not associated with progression over time.

Conclusion

Each non-obstructive plaque has its own individual morphologic pattern, and only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could predict their progression over time. High-risk characteristics could not predict progression, even when considered as a composite.

Original title: Differences in Progression to Obstructive Lesions per High-Risk Plaque Features and Plaque Volumes With CCTA.

Reference: Sang-Eun Lee et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;13(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.011.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...