Differences in Plaque Progression Depending on its Characteristics

The pattern of growth for each plaque differs according to the presence of certain risk factors. Atheroma volume at baseline was the most important predictor of plaque developing into obstructive lesions, as opposed to other characteristics historically considered as “dangerous.”

iFR en lesiones no culpables: el momento de la medición parece cambiar la historia

The aim of this study was to analyze whether the pattern of non-obstructive lesion progression could differ according to certain characteristics.

It is still debatable whether such characteristics simply represent a different phase during the natural history of the disease or if they can anticipate disease progression.

This prospective, multinational registry enrolled consecutive patients with non-obstructive coronary artery lesions (<50%), who underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography at intervals at least 2 years.

High-risk plaque was defined as lesions with 2 or more of the following features: positive remodeling, calcified nodules, and hypoattenuation. Baseline quantitative angiographic percent obstruction and atheroma volume were compared over time between high-risk and non-high-risk plaque.


Read also: Subintimal Re-Entry in CTO Improves Outcomes.


A total of 3049 non-obstructive lesions were identified in 1297 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 9.3 years); 425 lesions met the high-risk criteria and 2624 did not.

Upon adjusted multivariate analysis, only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could independently predict plaque progression (p < 0.05 for both). High-risk characteristics were not associated with progression over time.

Conclusion

Each non-obstructive plaque has its own individual morphologic pattern, and only baseline atheroma volume and obstruction percentage could predict their progression over time. High-risk characteristics could not predict progression, even when considered as a composite.

Original title: Differences in Progression to Obstructive Lesions per High-Risk Plaque Features and Plaque Volumes With CCTA.

Reference: Sang-Eun Lee et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun;13(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.011.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...