Impact on Mortality with Rivaroxaban after Discharge

Extending thromboembolic prophylaxis with rivaroxaban in patients hospitalized for heart conditions reduce fatal and thromboembolic events by 28% without major bleeding payback.  

Impacto sobre mortalidad con rivaroxaban al alta

Patients hospitalized for heart conditions are at risk of thromboembolic events, and this is why inhospital prophylaxis (in general with low molecular weight heparin) is within the standard treatment.

It was not clear whether extending primary prophylaxis would prevent thromboembolic events or, on the contrary, would be an unjustified bleeding risk.

The MARINER study (A Study of Rivaroxaban on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Post-Hospital Discharge Patients) included patients requiring hospitalization for cardiac cause also presenting thrombosis risk factors.

The double-blind study randomized 4909 patients to 10 mg rivaroxaban a day for 45 days after discharge, and 4913 patients to placebo.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | PRONOMOS: Rivaroxaban Superior to Enoxaparin in Orthopedic Surgery.


Final combined efficacy end point (symptomatic venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular dead) occurred in 1.28% of patients receiving rivaroxaban vs 1.77% of patients receiving placebo (HR 0.72; CI 95%: 0.52 to 1.00; p=0.049). The difference in major bleeding was non-significant (rivaroxaban group 0.27% vs 0.18%; p=0.398).

Conclusion

Extending prophylaxis duration with rivaroxaban for 45 days after discharge reduced fatal and thromboembolic events rate by 28% with no increase in bleeding.

Original Title: Post-Discharge Prophylaxis With Rivaroxaban Reduces Fatal and Major Thromboembolic Events in Medically Ill Patients.

Reference: Alex C. Spyropoulos et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:3140–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.071.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

Ultrathin vs Thin-Strut Stents in PCI Patients at High Bleeding Risk

Several in vivo studies have shown that ultrathin stents present lower thrombogenic risk vs. thin-strut stents, which reflects in lower rates of target lesion...

Should We Withdraw Anticoagulation Before TAVR?

Approximately one-third of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have atrial fibrillation and are on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This creates a complex...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....