Early Activation to Speed-Up Treatment of Infarcted Patients

Cath lab activation—and everything that entails—within 20 minutes was associated with the target of performing primary angioplasty in under 2 hours in at least 75% of patients.

Claves para mejorar la productividad en la sala de cateterismo

Historically, door-to-balloon time was measured, which provided a rough idea of where there could be flaws to fix. This is particularly true in the case of patients who need to be transferred to a higher-complexity facility where a primary angioplasty can be performed.

When these times are extended, interventional cardiologists claim that they were called in late, while clinical cardiologists state that the former arrived late at the hospital. This is a recurrent argument the following morning, when times and results are audited.

There might be multiple confounding factors in delays, so the novelty of this research is having measured the activation time, which provides an objective figure to improve practice.

Measuring cath lab activation time is new in the process of improving primary angioplasty in infarcted patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.


Read also: Is Medical Treatment Better at Lowering Bleeding-Caused Mortality than Angioplasty?


The aim of this work was to determine whether faster activation could mean faster reperfusion, especially in patients who need to be transferred. Having the procedure room ready when the patient is still in the ambulance does not make sense.

From 2015 to 2017, 2063 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary angioplasty were treated in 12 vastly different geographical areas of the United States.

Patients were stratified according to cath lab activation time (time between arrival to the first facility and cath lab activation in the second center). Mean time was 26 minutes, with over 60% of the population at above 20 minutes.


Read also: Infarction, Stroke and Aortic Emergency Syndromes in the Shadow of the Pandemic.


Cath lab activation within 20 minutes meant faster transfers (40 vs. 68 minutes) and faster reperfusions (98 vs. 135 minutes).

The targeted reperfusion within 120 minutes stated in the guidelines could be met in 80.1% of the population with early activation vs. only 39% of patients when activation took over 20 minutes.

The authors of this paper (recently published in Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes) never imagined the arrival of the new coronavirus. The pandemic has interrupted reperfusion time auditing, and even scientific societies recommend to “tolerate delays” to conduct adequate epidemiological evaluations or even prescribe thrombolysis (unprecedented suggestions in unprecedented times).

Conclusion

Measuring cath lab activation time is a useful tool to significantly improve reperfusion time.

Original Title: Catheterization Laboratory Activation Time in Patients Transferred With ST-Segment– Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Insights From the Mission: Lifeline STEMI Accelerator-2 Project.

Reference: Michel Zeitouni et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13:e006204. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006204.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...