TCT 2020 | Using OCT to Detect Vulnerable Plaque even with Negative FFR

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has proven useful in diabetic patients, even those with negative FFR. 

TCT OCT placas vulnerables incluso con FFR negativo

These findings make us rethink the ischemia and functional revascularization paradigm vs. the anatomical findings of vulnerable plaque. 

Diabetic patients with lesions that might be deferred base don FFR might benefit from OCT to find in these plaques certain risk features that will make them prone to developing events. 

This study called COMBINE OCT-FFR included 547 patients assessed with FFR and revascularized according to the standard cutoff value of 0.8. Patients with negative lesions (>0.8) were assessed with OCT and classified in vulnerable or not vulnerable according to fibroatheroma cap thickness. 


Read also: Further Evidence in Favor of Non-Invasive Vasospasm Diagnosis.


Primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, vessel related MI, clinically justified revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina. 

After 18-month followup, there was a 5-fold higher event rate in patients with vulnerable lesions due to thin-cap fibro-atheroma defined by OCT (13.3% vs 3.1%; HR 4.7).

There were no differences in events in patients undergoing revascularization based on FFR.


Read also: Diabetes Could Decide between Ticagrelor and Prasugrel.


According to Dr. Kedhi, this study has shown for the first time that diabetic patients might benefit from revascularization of certain lesions despite their not being functionally significative.

These conclusions have had different repercussion among panelists, which clearly shows controversy.

Original Title: Combined optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve assessment to better predict adverse event outcomes in DM patients.

Reference: Presentado por Kedhi E. en el TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...