TCT 2020 | Prophylactic Angioplasty for Vulnerable Plaques

Patients with vulnerable plaque identified by means of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are at a significantly increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.

TCT 2020 | Angioplastia preventiva para placas vulnerables

Revascularization of these vulnerable lesions could prevent clinical events. That is the theory behind prophylactic angioplasty, which still needs to be proven in clinical practice.

The PROSPECT ABSORB study, nested within the PROSPECT II study, analyzed the natural history of patients with vulnerable plaque treated with a now-discontinued bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

This was the first randomized study comparing prophylactic revascularization vs. optimal medical treatment in functionally non-significant lesions with high plaque volume.

PROSPECT II enrolled 898 infarcted patients with or without ST-segment elevation who underwent successful angioplasty on the culprit vessel, and who were assessed through NIRS and IVUS on the rest of their coronary tree.


Read also: TCT 2020 | Using OCT to Detect Vulnerable Plaque even with Negative FFR.


PROSPECT ABSORB enrolled 182 patients presenting more than one non-culprit lesion with a plaque level of at least 65% confirmed by IVUS. These patients were randomized to ABSORB revascularization vs. medical treatment.

The combined primary endpoint of cardiac death, vessel-related infarction, or clinically-driven revascularization occurred in 4.3% of patients in the ABSORB group vs. 4.5% in the medical treatment group (p = 0.96).

After 2 years of follow-up, researchers observed that the minimum lumen area of the lesions targeted by IVUS was significantly larger in the revascularization group compared to the medical treatment group. The lumen area of medically-treated plaque was stable, with no observed progression.


Read also: Further Evidence in Favor of Non-Invasive Vasospasm Diagnosis.


The difference in clinical events was based on severe angina episodes, a soft spot that emphasizes the controversial nature of prophylactic angioplasty.

Original title: Percutaneous coronary intervention for vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

Reference: Stone GW et al. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en forma virtual en el TCT 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...