Impact of FFR After Stenting: Useful or Mere Fun Fact?

Suboptimal fractional flow reserve (FFR) results after stenting only have a moderate impact on clinical hard points but might predict a much higher risk of reintervention.

Impacto del FFR post stent ¿dato útil o solo una curiosidad?

FFR has shown a huge impact on the decision-making process when it comes to revascularizing (or not) a lesion. Its impact after angioplasty has not been fully studied, particularly in the long term. We know the thresholds before angioplasty, but should there be target values after that procedure? If FFR does not improve as much as we expected after stenting, should it be optimized, somehow?

This large-scale study included all patients who underwent FFR-guided angioplasty.

FFR was measured immediately after angioplasty and then once the operator considered the outcome as acceptable and final. These results were only observational, since no action was taken based on them.

A suboptimal result was defined as final FFR <0.90. The final endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, infarction, and any revascularization after a 2-year follow-up.

With 1000 patients included and 1165 vessels analyzed, FFR after angioplasty was <0.9 in 440 vessels (37.8%). Almost 400 patients left the cath lab with at least one vessel whose FFR was suboptimal. This accounts for over a third of the procedures; its frequency is surprising. We should remember that no action was taken based on these results.


Read also: FREEDOM with FFR: Different Outcomes?


The analysis per patient did not show a significant association between FFR results after angioplasty and combined events after 2 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 1.60; p = 0.707). Upon consideration of each event separately, no association was found either.

The analysis per vessel offered different results. FFR <0.9 after angioplasty was associated with almost twice as many target-vessel revascularizations (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.06 to 3.44; p = 0.030) and a higher risk for thrombosis.

Conclusion

Suboptimal FFR after angioplasty had no significant impact on hard cardiovascular events, but it was associated with almost twice as many target-vessel revascularizations.

CIRCINTERVENTIONS-120-009681FREE

Original Title: Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes. The FFR-SEARCH Study.

Reference: Roberto Diletti et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009681. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009681.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...