EuroPCR 2021 | EBC MAIN: Provisional Stenting vs. Systematic Dual Stenting in Left Main Coronary Artery

Treating the left main coronary artery with provisional stenting was non-inferior to systematic dual stenting in the EBC MAIN trial, presented at EuroPCR 2021 and simultaneously published in the European Heart Journal.

stent provisional vs 2 stents sistemáticos en el tronco

The composite primary endpoint of death, infarction, and target-lesion revascularization was 14.7% for provisional stenting vs. 17.7% for systematic dual stenting (hazard ratio: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.5-1.3).

This discussion of strategies for treating the left coronary artery has been going on for several years and there seems to be no end in sight.

Some studies, such as NORDIC, suggest a higher mortality with dual stenting, while others, like randomized trial DKCRUSH-V, show the opposite.

DKCRUSH-V was the study on which the 2018 European guidelines based their recommendation of the double kissing crush technique over provisional stenting to treat left main artery bifurcation.

According to the authors, the results of the EBC MAIN suggest starting in the simplest way (provisional stenting); if the results are not as expected, converting to dual stenting is still possible. About 22% of patients randomized to provisional stenting required a second stent after kissing balloon, with no predictive factor detected.

In EBC MAIN, 467 patients —from 11 European countries—with left main coronary artery bifurcation lesion were randomized to provisional stenting (n = 230) vs. systematic dual stenting (n = 237).


Read also: EuroPCR 2021 | TVT Registry: Outcomes of TAVR in Low Surgical Risk Bicuspids.


The double stenting technique was left to operator discretion (culotte, DK crush, minicrush, T/Tap), but proximal optimization and kissing end-balloon were mandatory in both strategies.

Surprisingly enough, the use of intravascular imaging was not mandatory—something that many investigators criticized after the presentation. Another questionable aspect is that there was no experience or volume requirements for centers or operators (despite the fact that their impact has been proven on clinical outcomes and other studies, such as DKCRUSH, factored them in).

EBC-MAIN

Original Title: The European Bifurcation Club Left Main coronary stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).

Reference: Hildick-Smith D et al. Eur Heart Journal. 2021; Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....