ESC 2021 | TOMAHAWK: Angiography After Resuscitated Patients from Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with No ST Elevation.

What triggered this study was a long unanswered question: should patients successfully resuscitated from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest presenting a non-STEMI ECG be immediately taken to the cath lab? 

ESC 2021 | TOMAHAWK: Angiografía luego de un paro cardíaco reanimado y sin supradesnivel del ST

In response to this question the TOMAHAWK randomized 554 out-of-hospital resuscitated patients without electrocardiographic evidence of ST-segment elevation patients to immediate angiography (n=281) vs intensive care assessment for elective or delayed angiography (n=273).

Finally, for protocol reasons, 265 patients of each arm were analyzed. 

As a first finding, more than half of patients presented a defibrillating rhythm. Both arms required mean 15 minutes between cardiac arrest and return of spontaneous circulation 

Most patients in both arms had coronary lesions in one vessel. 38.1% in the immediate angiography arm vs. 43% in the elective angiography group had a clear culprit lesion. They all received an angiography in both arms. 

At 30 days, observed mortality was 54% in the immediate angiography group vs 46% in the delayed or elective angiography group. This difference was not statistically significative both by protocol analysis and by treatment. 

Most patients in both arms died from cerebral anoxia or circulatory collapse. 


Read also: ESC 2021 | MASTER DAPT: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Angioplasty in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.


There were several secondary end points to look at, though with the same result. Severe neurological deficit resulted similar between the groups, as did all safety end points such as bleeding, stroke or kidney injury. This suggests an early angiography holds neither benefits nor harm. Only when looking at the combination of death and severe neurological deficit do we see a higher incidence in the immediate angiography group (64.3% vs 55.6%, RR 1.16, CI 95% 1 to 1.34). This difference is barely reaching statistical significance. 

Roughly 40% of patients in the TOMAHAWK presented a culprit coronary lesion, but even in these cases, the neurological damage produced during cardiac attest was what sealed patient destiny. 

The outcomes of this study can be classified as neutral, even though its real value lies on patient management at arrival, after resuscitation, and with no ST elevation ECG reading. It seems prudent to take time to rule out other causes of cardiac arrest, count on a lab, etc. 

The TOMAHAWK supports the prior COACT outcomes, which had shown similar results at 90 days and a year.  

TOMAHAWK

Original Title: Angiography after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation.

Reference: Desch S et al. Presentado en el ESC el 29 de agosto 2021 y publicado simultáneamente en NEJM.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...