Prosthesis-Annular Size Ratio and Its Impact on Leaks

In low-risk patients, there was a very low incidence of greater than moderate leak, including in patients with minimal oversizing.

Tamaño de la prótesis con respecto al anillo y su impacto en los leaks

The degree of prosthesis oversizing had a great impact on mild paravalvular leak reduction and the need for post-dilation without changing valve hemodynamics.

This research investigated the impact of the perimeter and the area, measured by tomography, and the valve size chosen on the incidence of paravalvular leak in patients treated with a Sapien 3 prosthesis.

The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3) study included 495 low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Prosthesis sizing was based on annulus area, as measured by tomography.

Oversizing was 7.9 ± 8.7% for the annulus and 2.1 ± 4.1% for the perimeter. The incidence of leak greater than moderate was very low (0.6%).

The incidence of patients with leak greater than mild who required post-dilation was inversely proportional to the degree of oversizing.

In patients with intermediate measurements—who could therefore receive larger or smaller valves—, larger valves had a lower incidence of leak (12.0% vs. 43.4%; p < 0.0001).


Read also: 3rd Generation Valves in Large and X-Large Annuli.


Prosthesis size (rather than the degree of oversizing) impacted the effective orifice and gradients.

Conclusion

In patients who were candidates to two valvular measures because of their annulus, choosing the larger measure reduces the incidence of leak and improves their hemodynamic profile.

Original Title: Impact of Annular Oversizing on Paravalvular Regurgitation and Valve Hemodynamics: New Insights From PARTNER 3.

Reference: Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid et al. JACC Cardiovasc Inter. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2158-2169. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.018.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....