Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Should We Use Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion More Frequently? What Real-Life Data Are Available?

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to prevent atrial fibrillation stroke mainly used in patients at high risk for bleeding.

¿Debemos utilizar con mayor frecuencia el cierre de orejuela de la aurícula izquierda? ¿Qué datos tenemos de la vida real?

One of the most widely used devices in randomized trials is the Watchman, which yielded promising results. However, its real-life performance had yet to be analyzed.

Researchers conducted an analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry of the American College of Cardiology, which includes 366,814 patients implanted with the Watchman device.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was ischemic stroke, while the secondary endpoint (SEP) included death, hemorrhagic stroke, undetermined stroke, intracranial bleeding, any stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding.

Mean age was 76 years old, 58% of the patients were male, patient BMI was 30 [sic], over 90% of patients were hypertensive, 38% had diabetes, 25% had a prior stroke, 14% had a prior TIA, and 18% had a history of thromboembolism.

The HAS-BLED score was 3 and the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.8; 70% of patients experienced major bleeding, 42% experienced digestive bleeding, and 12% experienced intracranial bleeding.

Read also: WOEST 2 | Dual Versus Triple Antithrombotic Scheme in the Real World. Antiplatelet Therapy. Anticoagulation Scheme.

Atrial fibrillation was paroxysmal in 52% of cases; in all others, it was permanent or persistent.

Procedural success was 97%.

At discharge, 50% of patients received aspirin plus anticoagulation (warfarin or DOAC) and, to a lesser extent, anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Read also: Ticagrelor Shows Benefits in Coronary Microvascular Function after NSTEMI.

A one-year follow-up was conducted for 93.6% of patients.

The PEP was 1.53% (95% confidence interval: 1.39%-1.69%), the ischemic stroke rate was 2.19%, and all-cause mortality was 8.5%. The composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death at a year was 10.7%. Major bleeding was 6.9% (mostly occurring within 45 days after discharge).

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of the evolution of a cohort in the US with percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage. Knowing the data, physicians and patients can make joint decisions on this therapy.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org .

Original Title: Clinical Outcomes at 1 Year Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the United States.

Reference: Matthew J. Price, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:741–750.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...